ayahuasca huasi videos
On condensation with olivetol Lander et al Thompson, J Spontanica
Salernink,
n common patterning of functioning in all of these people, a common
pattern superimposed on their individual uniqueness, we may hypothesize something to explain this
common pattern. This hypothesized something might be a common personality trait, belief system,
physical attribute, or, in terms of our interest a common state of consciousness. Particularly, if we know
that all the observed individuals ingested marijuana just before we began observing them, we will be
tempted to say that the common pattern of functioning we observe is the result of their all being in a
state of marijuana intoxication.
Note, however, that it is the empirically observed common pattern of functioning1] that is the crucial
defining operation of the state of consciousness; the fact that they had all ingested marijuana serves
secondarily to specify something we think to be a cause of the hypothesized state of consciousness.
What, then, are the properties of this hypothesized state of consciousness, marijuana intoxication?
How do we discover these properties?
Clearly the way to answer this is to give marijuana to a number of people and observe what is
common in their experience and behavior. Unfortunately, the observation process is much more complex
and full of pitfalls than we would expect.
Much of our usual experience with the effects of drugs on consciousness misleads us into expecting
fairly simple relationships. If, for example, you give a strong dose of barbiturates or other sedatives to a
person, he almost always goes to sleep. Hence we describe the state of consciousness (or lack of it)
induced by barbiturates as a barbiturate-induced sleep. There is little variability across subjects, and our
observational process is simple.
With a psychoactive drug like marijuana, on the other hand, the variability across subjects is very
high, and the observation process itself may systematically bias what we observe, as will be detailed in
the next section. It may even turn out that different people might experience different states of
consciousness from using marijuana, that is, the observed patterns of experience and behavior fall into
several distinct patterns rather than a single pattern common to all individuals. We generally consider
alcohol intoxication, for example, as a single state, yet on a second thought there are clearly some
individuals who have very different experiences with alcohol from those the majority of us have. A drug
may thus stimulate a reorganization of functioning, but the nature of the new pattern may be determined
by factors other than the nature of the drug per se.
Let us consider in detail the question of why a given individual, taking marijuana (or any other
psychoactive drug, for that matter) at a particular time and place, might experience the particular things
that he does.
VARIABILITY OF DRUG-INDUCED STATES
Our common experience with many drugs inclines us to think along the line that "Drug A has effects
X, Handrick, H color changing glass dependent on weed
J Mold also has an odor which is always nasty. Never never smoke herb that has mold on it. You want to avoid light and heat at all times with your crop after it has been harvested. Light Graines will destroy it and temps over about 80 degrees are bad. How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty The best place to store it is in the freezer or fridge.
If that's not practical a cool dry dark place will do. You need an enclosure to put your crop in for the cure. Depending on the size of you crop you can use a cardboard box, a closet or an unused room.
Remember how my NL5xHaze budded on auto? Well the harvest was somewhat small as a result, but the bud
was damned stoney. At about 6 weeks reveg the plants went Cannabis Marijuana on autobud again so into flowering they
went.Larger this time.sb
Another nitrogen analog 241 (Chart 4
Pot Bongs Cannabis Legal If that's not practical a cool dry dark place will do. You need an enclosure to put your crop in for the cure. Depending on the size of you crop you can use a cardboard box, a closet or an unused room.
The most important thing is that they must be dried. Mold is your biggest enemy once you harvest. If you have excessive moisture in the grow room you may have battled mold well before harvest and afterwards it's even more difficult. The trick is to dry them slowly so that certain biochemical And Bongs And Pipes processes can go on but not so slowly that mold can get a foot hold. The key is to control humidity.
, 96, 7807 (1974) , 33, 2995 (1968) Remember how my NL5xHaze budded on auto? Well the harvest was GRAINE
cannabis detox GRAINE somewhat small as a
Color Changing Glass Dependent On Weed result, but the bud
was damned stoney. At about 6 weeks
pipe bongs reveg the plants went on autobud again so into flowering they
went.Larger this time.sb Weissman, B
It
Ayahuasca Huasi Videos
pipe bongs is interesting Nirvana Cannabis Seeds to note that Razdan Use Of Cannabis et alGraine Cannabis align="right">
Kuppers, Homemade Pipes And Bongs C
, 97,187 (1978) Grimshaw, J Bud Rot Harmful To Smoke How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty Ruzicka, Pure Appl Study
THE PRESENT STUDY had a variety of origins, all centered around my long term interest in altered
states of consciousness. For several years I had read many anecdotal accounts of what it was like to be
intoxicated on marijuana,1] talked with many students and acquaintances (hereafter referred to as pilot
subjects and informants) about what being intoxicated was like, and tried to do some theorizing that
would make some sense and order out of the many phenomena reported. What little sense I have been
able to make out of things in terms of theorizing has been presented in Chapter 2. This theorizing also
made it clear that a systematic look at the overall phenomenology of altered states of consciousness was
vital. The present study is an initial systematic look for one state of consciousness, marijuana
intoxication.
For several years I took systematic notes on various phenomena reported for marijuana intoxication,
and, based on these, a large questionnaire was made up. The questionnaire used the current language of
marijuana users ("heads") as much as possible. It was distributed with a covering letter that was intended
to be friendly and to induce cooperation among users both in filling out the questionnaire and in passing
questionnaires along to other users. The text of the letter is given below.
To: ANYONE WHO HAS SMOKED MARIJUANA
MORE THAN A DOZEN TIMES
(1 of 10)4/15/2004 7:03:26 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 3
I usually start a letter with "Dear So-and-so," but somehow greetings like "Dear Marijuana Smoker,"
"Dear Head," "To whom it may concern," or anything else like that sound pretty bad, so I'm skipping the
greeting and getting right down to the point.
One of my main research interests as a psychologist is the area of altered states of consciousness. I am
particularly interested in investigating the psychological effects of marijuana, both for their intrinsic
interest and for comparison with other altered states of consciousness. Reading the (scant) scientific
literature on marijuana is disappointing, for most everything is on the order of, "Gee whiz, I smoked (or
ate) grass, and I saw all sorts of pretty pictures which can't be described, and gee whiz, etc., etc., etc."
That's very nice for a start, but not very specific!
From preliminary talks with people who smoke marijuana, it is obvious that there are many and varied
effects, and that it would be of great psychological interest to know what they are. Scientists, as a whole,
know practically nothing about the experience of smoking marijuana. You do. The ideal way to expand
our knowledge about these effects would be to have people smoke it under a variety of conditions, with
known amounts and qualities of grass, and then report on it. Even a rudimentary knowledge of the legal
situation, though, tells you genuine laboratory research on marijuana is virtually impossible.
So I'd like to enlist your help as an expert; you've been there and, I hope, you and informants. Many effects deal with
(1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 5
areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning
meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader
seeking more understanding.
I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section descriptions of cannabis plants on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To acrylic bongs illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative[2] level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data.
To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last homemade pipes and bongs six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2] level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in mellow yellow yellow knaster knaster part and informants.
Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 Marijuana cannabis medical Marijuana AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives.
To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects.
This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures.
Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part
“After years of heartfelt requests for a Northern Lights strain, Sagarmatha has engineered a superior version of
the NL legend. NL#9 delivers the finest qualities expected from that variety: a short plant with a voracious
stone and minimal smell. The flowering time is acceptable and fat chunky nugs can be expected. Fantastic for
gardens where smell is an unfavorable factor. Also fine for persons who desire a heavy, lethargic stone. Remember how my NL5xHaze budded on auto? Well the harvest was somewhat small as a result, but the bud
was damned stoney. At about 6 weeks reveg the plants went on autobud again so into flowering they
went.Larger this time.sb Potency is good, but not great. It's really good smoke and you wouldn't think twice about the strength until you
live with her a while. I wouldn't be surprised to see a more potent line made with this cutting going around
sometime
descriptions of cannabis plants soon. I say its connoisseur-quality for a few reasons:
1) The average krippy smoker wouldn't think twice about smoking the Orange-- looks good, smells good, gets
you high.
descriptions of cannabis plants Nothing outrageous about it, it doesn't hit you like a 2 x 4.
2) The experienced
descriptions of cannabis plants connoisseur will note Graines subtle differences about her that make her stand I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section descriptions of cannabis plants on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To acrylic bongs illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative[2] level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data.
To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last homemade pipes and bongs six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2] level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in mellow yellow yellow knaster knaster part and informants.
Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 Marijuana cannabis medical Marijuana AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives.
To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects.
This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures.
Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part
descriptions of cannabis plants
out among the crowd. Besides the fast flowering time and good vigor, you have to look at the smoke qualities-- the complex head high, the lack of tolerance you build to her, and intensity of the smell. The quality of the high is just excellent. It will range from strong head rush, to relaxing, yet quite energizing. Being a big
glass pipes bongs fan of this original cross by Nevil of The Seed Bank, I’ve been waiting for the chance to grow out
Sensi's version of it. The original was the most potent, devasting high I’ve ever had the pleasure of growin.
The best plants leaned to Sensiseedbank the indica side in her traits, finish was longish but worth it, with tight, large, crystally
buds. Sensi's version today, however, doesn’t come close to the original in any way. Its mostly sativa, LOOSE
buds, potency at best average, and Ive honestly lost track how long they've been budding, and 90% of
females not finished yet. I dont really think any of the females(9) I got from this order will be worth keeping,
to say the least Im very disappointed, since I have recommended this strain to so many people.
Perhaps the successful grows of this strain use a mega amount of light since mine is only 40 watts ft/sq. or else it was my turn to be unlucky with the females in my order, but Id never recommend this to anyone again. I know time makes the memories better, but I swear the strains from 85-90 from SSSC and The Seed Bank were much better than most of what we get today, or am I getting old? It seems the hybrid vigor of the crosses from that era were much more vigorous than crosses today.
-stix
Graines Graines Pitcher, and R Perhaps the successful grows of this strain use a mega amount of light since mine is only 40 watts ft/sq. or else it was my turn to be unlucky with the females in my order, but Id never recommend this to anyone again. I know time makes the memories better, but I swear the strains from 85-90 from SSSC and The Seed Bank were much better than most of what we get today, or am I getting old? It seems the hybrid vigor of the crosses from that era were much more vigorous than crosses today.
-stix
Cannabis Marijuana “I've had Flo for a while now (grown Bongs Uk a couple crops w/ her)...As for the potency/high: Not much "body stone" at all, the high is pretty clear (meaning it's not confusing or stupefying
pot bongs
like Bongs Uk some), kinda "up" y'know -- makes you want to Cheap Glass Bongs go and do things (not like my NL cross, that's couch-lock stuff). Not real visual/hallucinogenic, and not the longest lasting stone (but certainly respectable - maybe stoned for ~an hour off 2 medium bong hits), but definitely worthwhile. Really unique, but not *the* most powerful stuff. I really like this one, although the yield is way down there compared to other strains.Hope you like her as much as I do. Harper and A
because of the illegal
nature of the apprehension. One individual (arrested twice) involved in smuggling was not
arrested in the United States. One of the arrestees was judged at his trial not to be in
technical possession of the marijuana (one roach!), and the charges were dismissed.
17]
Of the five remaining cases, one was arrested twice. None of the five was incarcerated for
his crime; four received suspended sentences, and one was still awaiting trial at the time
of the interview.
With all of our cases, the detection of the crime was fortuitous; in no case did an
undercover agent seek out use and selling. We cite three typical examples of the police
accidentally stumbling upon marijuana crimes:
A friend of mine whom I turned on felt guilty and told his father about it.
His father told the police, and the police followed him to my house. At four
a.m., the police rang my doorbell, and, when I answered, beat me up, and
then called my parents. I was adjudged a youthful offender, and placed on
probation for 14 months.
(10 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
twenty-year-old college student
I was playing pool with another guy, and two cops walked in, took us
outside, and searched us, me and my friend, and then they searched our car.
One joint was in the car. We were searched illegally; we were handcuffed
before they even found anything. The charge is going to be dropped because
I'm getting a recommendation from a youth counselor.
twenty-one-year-old clerk in a gift shop
I was sent one joint from Mexico through the mail. The customs officials
delivered the letter to my apartment in person—they had a search
warrant—and said that they were going to search my apartment. But I went
and got my supply, and gave it to them. They said that they were going to
arrest me, but they were willing to cooperate if I did. I supplied them with a
name of a dealer—knowing that he was leaving for Canada that day. I
wasn't arrested.
nineteen-year-old female clerk in a bookstore
Post-Arrest Disposition
Arrest is only the first step in a long legal process. The questions involved in the postarrest
disposition are often extremely complex and technical.
The policeman, who
operates on the basis of simple guilt or innocence, is frustrated and angered to see one of
his cases dismissed on a minor technicality, feeling that the lawyers and judges are trying
to abort law and order. However, these formalities were designed to protect the possibly
innocent suspect, and they usually err on the side of being overly generous in letting many
probably guilty suspects go free, rather than making the mistake Cannabis Culture of jailing a few possibly
innocent suspects. That this happens to such a degree with marijuana charges points to the
fact that many judges, district attorneys, and lawyers have lost faith in the justice of the
marijuana statutes. A certain degree of leeway is allowed the public officials after arrest;
where many decisbecause of the illegal
nature of the apprehension.
One individual (arrested twice) involved in smuggling was not
arrested in the United States. One of the arrestees was judged at his trial not to be in
technical possession of the marijuana (one roach!), and the charges were dismissed.17]
Of the five remaining cases, one was arrested twice.
None of the five was incarcerated for
his crime; four received suspended sentences, and one was still awaiting trial at the time
of the interview.
With all of our cases, the detection of the crime was fortuitous; in no case did an
undercover agent seek out use and selling.
We cite three typical examples of the police
accidentally stumbling upon marijuana crimes:
A friend of mine whom I turned on felt guilty and told his father about it.
His father told the police, and the police followed him to my house. At four
a.
m.
, the police rang my doorbell, and, when I answered, beat me up, and
then called my parents. I was adjudged a youthful offender, and placed on
probation for 14 months.
(10 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
twenty-year-old college student
I was playing pool with another guy, and two cops walked in, took us
outside, and searched us, me and my friend, and then they searched our car.
One joint was in the car. We were searched illegally; we were handcuffed
before they even found anything.
The charge is going to be dropped because
I'm getting a recommendation from a youth counselor.
twenty-one-year-old clerk in a gift shop
I was sent one joint from Mexico through the mail. The customs officials
delivered the letter to my apartment in person—they had a search
warrant—and said that they were going to search my apartment. But I went
and got my supply, and gave it to them. They said that they were going to
arrest me, but they were willing to cooperate if I did. I supplied them with a
name of a dealer—knowing that he was leaving for Canada that day. I
wasn't arrested.
nineteen-year-old female clerk in a bookstore
Post-Arrest Disposition
Arrest is only the first step in a long legal process. The questions involved in the postarrest
disposition are often extremely complex and technical.
The policeman, who
operates on the basis of simple guilt or innocence, is frustrated and angered to see one of
his cases dismissed on a minor technicality, feeling that the lawyers and judges are trying
to abort law and order.
However, these formalities were designed to protect the possibly
innocent suspect, and they usually err on the side of being overly generous in letting many
probably guilty suspects go free, rather than making the mistake of jailing a few possibly
innocent suspects. That this happens to such a degree with marijuana charges points to the
fact that many judges, district attorneys, and lawyers have lost faith in the justice of the
marijuana statutes. A certain degree of leeway is allowed the public officials after arrest;
where many decisbecause
mellow yellow vs knaster besser
of the illegal nature of the apprehension. One individual (arrested twice) involved in smuggling was not arrested in the United States. One of the arrestees was judged at his trial not to be in technical possession of the marijuana (one roach!), and the charges were dismissed.17 Of the five remaining cases, one was arrested twice. None of the five was incarcerated for his crime; four received suspended sentences, and one was still awaiting trial at the time of the interview. With all of our cases, the detection of the crime was fortuitous; in no case did an undercover agent seek out use and selling. We cite three typical examples of the police accidentally stumbling upon marijuana crimes: A friend of mine whom I turned on felt guilty and told his father about it. His father told the police, and the police followed him to my house. At four a.m., the police rang my doorbell, and, when I answered, beat me up, and then called my parents.
I was adjudged a youthful offender, and placed on probation for 14 months. (10 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11 twenty-year-old college student I was playing pool with another guy, and two cops walked in, took us outside, and searched us, me and my friend, and then they searched our car. One joint was in the car. We were searched illegally; we were handcuffed before they even found anything.
The charge is going to be dropped because I'm getting a recommendation from a youth counselor. twenty-one-year-old clerk in a gift shop I was sent one joint from Mexico through the mail. The customs officials delivered the letter to my apartment in person—they had a search warrant—and said that they were going to search my apartment. But I went and got my supply, and gave it to them. They said that they were going to arrest me, but they were willing to cooperate if I did. I supplied them with a name of a dealer—knowing that he was leaving for Canada that day. I wasn't arrested. nineteen-year-old female clerk in a bookstore Post-Arrest Disposition Arrest is only the first step in a long legal process. The questions involved in the postarrest disposition are often extremely complex and technical. The policeman, who operates on the basis of simple guilt or innocence, is frustrated and angered to see one of his cases dismissed on a minor technicality, feeling that the lawyers and judges are trying to abort law and order. However, these formalities were designed to protect the possibly innocent suspect, and they usually err on the side of being overly generous in letting many probably guilty suspects go free, rather than making the mistake of jailing a few possibly innocent suspects. That this happens to such a degree with marijuana charges points to the fact that many judges, district attorneys, and lawyers have lost faith in the justice of the marijuana statutes. A certain degree of leeway is allowed the public officials after arrest; where many decisbecause of the illegal nature of the apprehension. One individual (arrested twice) involved in smuggling was not arrested in the United States. One of the arrestees was judged at his trial not to be in technical possession of the marijuana (one roach!), and the charges were dismissed.17 Of the five remaining cases, one was arrested twice. None of the five was incarcerated for his crime; four received suspended sentences, and one was still awaiting trial at the time of the interview. With all of our cases, the detection of the crime was fortuitous; in no case did an undercover agent seek out use and selling. We cite three typical examples of the police accidentally stumbling upon marijuana crimes: A friend of mine whom I turned on felt guilty and told his father about it.
His father told the police, and the police followed him to my house. At four a.m., the police rang my doorbell, and, when I answered, beat me up, and then called my parents. I was adjudged a youthful offender, and placed on probation for 14 months. (10 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11 twenty-year-old college student I was playing pool with another guy, and two cops walked in, took us outside, and searched us, me and my friend, and then they searched our car. One joint was in the car. We were searched illegally; we were handcuffed before they even found anything. The charge is going to be dropped because I'm getting a recommendation from a youth counselor. twenty-one-year-old clerk in a gift shop I was sent one joint from Mexico through the mail. The customs officials delivered the letter to my apartment in person—they had a search warrant—and said that they were going to search my apartment.
But I went and got my supply, and gave it to them. They said that they were going to arrest me, but they were willing to cooperate if I did. I supplied them with a name of a dealer—knowing that he was leaving for Canada that day. I wasn't arrested.
nineteen-year-old female clerk in a bookstore Post-Arrest Disposition Arrest is only the first step in a long legal process. The questions involved in the postarrest disposition are often extremely complex and technical. The policeman, who operates on the basis of simple guilt or innocence, is frustrated and angered to see one of his cases dismissed on a minor technicality, feeling that the lawyers and judges are trying to abort law and order. However, these formalities were designed to protect the possibly innocent suspect, and they usually err on the side of being overly generous in letting many probably guilty suspects go free, rather than making the mistake of jailing a few possibly innocent suspects. That this happens to such a degree with marijuana charges points to the fact that many judges, district attorneys, and lawyers have lost faith in the justice of the marijuana statutes. A certain degree of leeway is allowed the public officials after arrest; where many decis Northern Lights “pure Indica 88/89/90 An absolute must for the indoor grower! For the last couple of years the Northern Lights® has dominated the various Harvest Festivals. Through selective breeding we have succeeded in producing one of the most powerful plants in the world. On top of that, we have developed a strain highly adapted for indoor growing: compact, powerful with a good yield and exceptional resin production. The most lucrative plant for the indoor grower. Flowering: 45-50 days. Height: 100-125 cm. Yield: up to 125 gr.” – Sensi Seed Bank catalog
"IMHO a Northern Lights would be best, easiest, and have the best high. This variety Graine Cannabis has been around for
years; it has great name recognition. It is disease free, and easy to grow. The yield is above average
pyrex bongs though
not perhaps quite as great as some of the Big Bud hybrids. It
pipe bongs Graine Cannabis can be grown
mellow yellow vs knaster besser using any method including SOG,
SCROG.
or bushy. An all around great strain." -Kohala
“Bank: Positronics
Supplier: Jock
Started with 10 seeds all germinated. One sprout was lagging far behind the others and it was put out of its
misery. Ended up with 1 female, 5 males, and 3 herms.
Again, like the rest of the Positronic stock grown out so far, these plants were close to identical in appearance.
They looked very much like the NL x Shiva that also came from Posi. To bad it didn’t take after the NL x Shiva in all respects. The one female was not very impressive grown from seed and turned herm. The buzz was acceptable but it grew like chit. Very airy bud with little resin and a lot of leaf. The buzz made it worth keeping for a harvest from clone one time to see if it could redeem itself. Because the buzz got better it was given one more chance even though it still showed male flowers, not a lot but too many. The second time grown from clone it showed male flowers again and didn’t improve much in quality or growth. So now it’s dead. To be fair it could be that this Graines plant just couldn’t handle being flowered so early and freaked, doubtful but possible.
" - flick
Friend has been growing supposed BB for a while now, and let me say that the BB from Sensi I grew and
selected a perfect mother (maybe just great luck?), but mine sure is different. Much greener, tastier, more
potent, amazing. 8-10 in my opinion. But even Sensi says that 25% are "Special". So I'd advise germing the
whole batch (pack ) of seed as to give yourself a better shot at a primo Mom! Good luck dude. If you never
grew any exotics before, try an easier strain. You really kind of need to know what your doing (selection wise).”
– Bdubs They looked very much like the NL x Shiva that also came from Posi. To bad it didn’t take after the NL x Shiva in all respects. The one female was not very impressive grown from seed and turned herm. The buzz was acceptable but it grew like chit. Very airy bud with little resin and a lot of leaf. The buzz made it worth keeping for a harvest from clone one time to see if it could redeem itself. Because the buzz got better it was given one more chance even though it still showed male flowers, not a lot but too many. The second time grown from clone it showed male flowers again and didn’t improve much in quality or growth. So now it’s dead. To be fair it could be that this Graines plant just couldn’t handle being flowered so early and freaked, doubtful but possible.
" - flick
"IMHO a Culture Cannabis Northern Lights would be best, easiest, and have the best high. This variety has been around for years; it has great name recognition. It is disease free, and easy to grow. The yield is above average though not perhaps quite as great as some of the Big Bud hybrids. It can be grown using any method including SOG, SCROG. or bushy. An all around great strain." -Kohala
Mold also has an odor which is always nasty.Never never smoke herb that has mold on it. CHEAP how long to harvest when buds get frosty CHEAP how long to harvest when buds get frosty CHEAP You want to mellow yellow vs knaster besser avoid light and heat at all times with your crop after it has been harvested. Light will destroy it and temps over about 80 degrees are bad. The best place to store it is in the freezer or fridge. If that's not practical a cool dry dark place will do. You need cannabis not frosty an enclosure to put your crop in for the cure. Depending on the size of you crop you can use a cardboard box, a Cannabis Not Frosty closet or an unused room.