"germinate old marijuana seeds"
The "proofs" which have been submitted on this issue are perfect illustrations of our earlier axiom concerning the need to shore up propaganda with pseudoscientific accoutrements. Probably no area of endeavor better illustrates our principle concerning the "politics of reality" than this, the connection between marijuana and crime. The causal connection between marijuana and crime exists only in the minds of men. Paper, as Stalin so cynically observed—and, indeed, put into practice—can be made to print anything. The studies most often cited to prove that marijuana causes crime are those by Munch ("Marihuana and Crime"), Wolff (Marihuana in Latin America), Gardikas ("Hashish and Crime"), an unpublished manuscript by Victor Vogel, and several works by the Indian Chopras. We will examine these reports. Half of Munch's eight-page article on marijuana and crime20] is taken up with enumeration of crimes committed, supposedly, under the influence of marijuana. ( Or so the caption indicates. There is no indication of how the police detected marijuana intoxication. During the entire period when all of the enumerated crimes were committed, there was no known method for detecting the presence of marijuana in the human body. In some of the cases, clues were mentioned, but most of them omit references to the drug.) Sixty-nine cases are included, going back to the 1930S (in one case, back to 1921, before the existence of marijuana laws). A
PerfClone
typical case might be "Smoked marijuana for years; held up three taxi-cabs," or "Negro, shot and killed while attempting to holdup grocer in Harlem; plea guilty." Only a glance back at the discussion of the enumerative method of reasoning illuminates the worth of this procedure. Another section of Munch's article is an enumeration of "references" which lists works, most of which assert the connection between marijuana and crime without empirical documentation. A table presents, supposedly, effects of marijuana on the human mind and body. Several of these effects have been empirically demonstrated to be false: hypoglycemia (decrease in blood sugar), a decrease in the rate of respiration, and mydriasis (marked dilation of the pupils), for instance. Other effects are merely asserted and are, by all known accounts, highly improbable: "chronic exposure produces brain lesions," "death by cardiac failure some individuals after l00 to 200 times therapeutic dose,"21] "hypersensitivity sensation of ants running over skin" (not one of my 200 respondents described this particular sensation), "diarrhea or constipation," etc. One wonders, after this inventory of effects, why anyone would ever try the drug; if one believed that these effects ever took place, the fact that millions of people in this country (17 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9 have tried it would be puzzling. Another study commonly cited by police in an effort to demonstrate the criminal tendenns supreme. The "proofs" which have been submitted on this issue are perfect illustrations of our earlier axiom concerning the need to shore up propaganda with pseudoscientific accoutrements.Probably no area of endeavor better illustrates our principle concerning the "politics of reality" than this, the connection between marijuana and crime.
The causal connection between marijuana and crime exists only in the minds of men. Paper, as Stalin so cynically observed—and, indeed, put into practice—can be made to print anything. The studies most often cited to prove that marijuana causes crime are those by Munch ("Marihuana and Crime"), Wolff (Marihuana in Latin America), Gardikas ("Hashish and Crime"), an unpublished manuscript by Victor Vogel, and several works by the Indian Chopras. We will examine these reports. Half of Munch's eight-page article on marijuana and crime20] is taken up with enumeration of crimes committed, supposedly, under the influence of marijuana. ( Or so the caption indicates. There is no indication of how the police detected marijuana intoxication. During the entire period when all of the enumerated crimes were committed, there was no known method for detecting the presence of marijuana in the human body. In some of the cases, clues were mentioned, but most of them omit references to the drug.) Sixty-nine cases are included, going back to the 1930S (in one case, back to 1921, before the existence of marijuana laws).
A typical case might be "Smoked marijuana for years; held up three taxi-cabs," or "Negro, shot Overgrow and killed while attempting to holdup grocer in Harlem; plea guilty." Only a glance back at the discussion of the enumerative method of reasoning illuminates the worth of this procedure. Another section of Munch's article is an enumeration of "references" which lists works, most of which assert the connection between marijuana and crime without empirical documentation.
A table presents, supposedly, effects of marijuana on the human mind and body. Several of these effects have been empirically demonstrated to be false: hypoglycemia (decrease in blood sugar), a decrease in the rate of respiration, and mydriasis (marked dilation of the pupils), for instance. Other effects are merely asserted and are, by all known accounts, highly improbable: "chronic exposure produces brain lesions," "death by cardiac failure some individuals after l00 to 200 times therapeutic dose,"21] "hypersensitivity sensation of ants running over skin" (not one of my 200 respondents described this particular sensation), "diarrhea or constipation," etc. One wonders, after this inventory of effects, why anyone would ever try the drug; if one believed that these effects ever took place, the fact that millions of people in this country (17 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9 have tried it would be puzzling. Another study commonly cited by police in an effort to demonstrate the criminal tendenns supreme. The "proofs" which have been submitted on this issue are perfect illustrations of our earlier axiom concerning the need to shore up propaganda with pseudoscientific accoutrements. Probably no area of endeavor better illustrates our principle concerning the "politics of reality" than this, the connection between marijuana and crime. The causal connection between marijuana and crime exists only in the minds of men. Paper, as Stalin so cynically observed—and, indeed, put into practice—can be made to print anything. The studies most often cited to prove that marijuana causes crime are those by Munch ("Marihuana and Crime"), Wolff (Marihuana in Latin America), Gardikas ("Hashish and Crime"), an unpublished manuscript by Victor Vogel, and several works by the Indian Chopras. We will examine these reports. Half of Munch's eight-page article on marijuana and crime20 is taken up with enumeration of crimes committed, supposedly, under the influence of marijuana. ( Or so the caption indicates.
There is no indication of how the police detected marijuana intoxication. During the entire period when all of the enumerated crimes were committed, there was no known method for detecting the presence of marijuana in the human body. In some of the cases, clues were mentioned, but most of them omit references to the drug.) Sixty-nine cases are included, going back to the 1930S (in one case, back to 1921, before the existence of marijuana laws). A typical case might be "Smoked marijuana for years; held up three taxi-cabs," or "Negro, shot and killed while attempting to holdup grocer in Harlem; plea guilty." Only a glance back at the discussion of the enumerative method of reasoning Bong Homemade Homemade illuminates the worth of this procedure. Another section of Munch's article is an enumeration of "references" which lists works, most of which assert the connection between marijuana and crime without empirical documentation. A table presents, supposedly, effects of marijuana on the human mind and body. Several of these effects have been empirically demonstrated to be false: hypoglycemia (decrease in blood sugar), a decrease in the rate of respiration, and mydriasis (marked dilation of the pupils), for instance.
Other effects are merely asserted and are, by all known accounts, highly improbable: "chronic exposure produces brain lesions," "death by cardiac failure some individuals after l00 to 200 times therapeutic dose,"21 "hypersensitivity sensation of ants running over skin" (not one of my 200 respondents described this particular sensation), "diarrhea or constipation," etc. One wonders, after this inventory of effects, why anyone would ever try the drug; if one believed that these effects ever took place, the fact that millions of people in this country (17 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9 have tried it would be puzzling. Another study commonly cited by police in an effort to demonstrate the criminal tendenns supreme.
The "proofs" which have been submitted on this issue are perfect illustrations of our earlier axiom concerning the need to shore up propaganda with pseudoscientific accoutrements. Probably no area of endeavor better illustrates our principle concerning the "politics of reality" than this, the connection between marijuana and crime.
The causal connection between marijuana and crime exists only in the minds of men. Paper, as Stalin so cynically observed—and, indeed, put into practice—can be made to print anything. The studies most often cited to prove that marijuana causes crime are those by Munch ("Marihuana and Crime"), Wolff (Marihuana in Latin America), Gardikas ("Hashish and Crime"), an unpublished manuscript by Victor Vogel, and several works by the Indian Chopras. We will examine these reports. Half of Munch's eight-page article on marijuana and crime20 is taken up with enumeration of crimes committed, supposedly, under the influence of marijuana. ( Or so the caption indicates. There is no indication of how the police detected marijuana intoxication. During the entire period when all of the enumerated crimes were committed, there was no known method for detecting the presence of marijuana in the human body. In some of the cases, clues were mentioned, but most of them omit references to the drug.) Sixty-nine cases are included, going back to the 1930S (in one case, back to 1921, before the existence of marijuana laws).
A typical case might be "Smoked marijuana for years; held up three taxi-cabs," or "Negro, shot and killed while attempting to holdup grocer in Harlem; plea guilty." Only a glance back at the discussion of the enumerative method of reasoning illuminates the worth of this procedure. Another section of Munch's article is an enumeration of "references" which lists works, most of which assert the connection between marijuana and crime without empirical documentation. A table presents, supposedly, effects of marijuana on the human mind and body. Several of these effects have been empirically demonstrated to be false: hypoglycemia (decrease in blood sugar), a decrease in the rate of respiration, and mydriasis (marked dilation of the pupils), for instance. Other effects are merely asserted and are, by all known accounts, highly improbable: "chronic exposure produces brain lesions," "death by cardiac failure some individuals after l00 to 200 times therapeutic dose,"21 "hypersensitivity sensation of ants running over skin" (not one of my 200 respondents described this particular sensation), "diarrhea or constipation," etc. One wonders, after this inventory of effects, why anyone would ever try the drug; if one believed that these effects ever took place, the fact that millions of people in this country (17 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9 have tried it would be puzzling. Another study commonly cited by police in an effort to demonstrate the criminal tenden
My Niagaras are starting to flower! They were planted outside a month ago when they were 3 weeks old. Man was I surprised When Perfclone I Perfclone went out to water them today and some of them had nuts ready to bust, I caught Use Of Cannabis em' just in time. Perfclone The others were just starting to show white hairs. I wasn’t expecting them to show sex for at least another month. My guess is that Niagara and Niagara x Perfclone shiva auto-flower Perfclone automatically at sixty days.” –Robin
Was it you that had experience with NLxHaze? I now have two from
PerfClone Sensi that are growing like wildfire in my
flowering closet. They have almost taken over. My question is are these girls going to be worth the trouble they
are causing. If not I am thinking of ripping them out now. It is really running on me. Has to be the Haze.
Here's to hoping it is all you say. I will tough it out. I had a similar problem with NLxHaze from the bc seed co.
These did not preflower.They full on began to flower at about 6-7 weeks.When it became apparent that they
would continue, I moved them into the flowering area. How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty After a decent harvest, I revegged all three and after
about 5-6 weeks they began to flower automatically AGAIN. I have bred these plats and their offspring have
just begun to break soil. I'll just go with the flow and play jr.scientist trying to find out if it was enviromental or
genetic. It was great and worth the money but still not the best I ever had... growing conditions could have
been a little better. The buzz was powerful and very up heady, a little disorientating and a good laster. Taste
was unique kind of a lime flavor with a fruity-tooty hint. mellow burn. excellent stuff but I have had stronger in
jamacia.
slow-slow-slow grower and quite pricey for the seed bongs bank seeds. I may have gotten better results had
I waited longer and dryed longer. I still have 5 seeds left and 4 clones so I am going to refine my growing
techniuqe. but it will be a long time for 2nd set Cannabis Seeds Shop of results. would I recommend it yes but maybe not on limited
funds or for the impatient grower. I love the taste though and the buzz... awesome!Turbo
Culture Cannabis pictures of bongs align="right">
Perfclone
pictures of bongs Chem, 14B, Cannabis Floraison 449 (1976) pictures of bongspictures of bongs
Make how to grow cannabis seeds Make how to grow cannabis seeds To how to grow cannabis seeds Make align="center"> Jack Herer Padwa ceramic bongs and homemade pipes and bongs G
"GROW THE A-11 FIRST!!!, it is WORLD class smoke!!! But I have to warn you, after you have grown this cross of Cinderella 99 and Genius, 90% of everything else you grow won't come close!!! So clone all your females, if you let this one slip through your fingers you will be bummed!!! The bud from Apollo has a sweet fruity/citrus taste, and a high that gives you the energy to go out and do something...even if you can't remember what it is!!! Every one that has smoked the A (my Awesome Homemade Bong version is the A-13, Genius crossed with Cinderella88.The A-11 is even better then A-13 according to BG!!!) has said it is some of the best they have ever smoked!"- greenbear “Bank: Positronics Supplier: Jock Started with 10 seeds all germinated. One sprout was lagging far behind the others and it was put out of its misery. Ended up with 1 female, 5 males, and 3 herms. Again, like the rest of the Positronic stock grown out so far, these plants were close to identical in appearance. They looked very much like the NL x Shiva that also came from Posi. To bad it didn’t take after the NL x Shiva in all respects. The one female was not very impressive grown from seed and turned herm. The buzz was acceptable but it grew like chit. Very airy bud with little resin and a lot of leaf. The buzz made it worth keeping for a harvest from clone one time to see if it could redeem itself. Because the buzz got better it was given one more chance even though it still showed male flowers, not a lot but too many. The second time grown from clone it showed male flowers again and didn’t improve much in quality or growth. So now it’s dead. To be fair it could be that this plant just couldn’t handle being flowered so early and freaked, doubtful but possible." - flickat the study of a cross-section of all individuals who have tried marijuana, or even who smoke it regularly, however regularly might be defined, will yield very few who are high all of the time, or even more than a few hours each evening. The facts do not support the stoned model. When the user smokes marijuana he does, indeed, become high, or stoned. And if one observed his behavior during this period, he is often measurably less active than normally. But to say that it is the ultimate goal of a large proportion of users to seek this state most of the time is to distort the facts. It is only because researchers cannot understand why anyone would want to become high in the first place that they find it necessary to attach the label "psychological addiction" or "habituation" to his behavior and motives. If they found use of the substance acceptable, they would not emit this labeling behavior. It is clear that another model is necessary. And this model, I propose, is Cannabis Shop Cannabis the recreational model. It fits the facts more faithfully than any of the previously mentioned models. And it contains none of the moral judgments that the others are clearly guilty of. The recreational model takes issue with these perspectives. Essential to the recreational conception of marijuana use are the following elements: (1) it is used freely, noncompulsively; (2) it is smoked episodically—once or several times a week or so on the average; (3) it is experienced as pleasurable by the participants; (4) it is used in conjunction with (and not a replacement for) other enjoyable activities; (5) its impact on one's life is relatively superficial; (6) its use results in relatively little harm to the individual; and (7) its use is highly social. By adopting the recreational perspective toward marijuana use, I do not wish to imply that everyone who has ever smoked marijuana may be described in terms of this model, nor even that a majority of all users are typified by all of these principles. It is, however, to say that this model presents a relatively accurate summarization of the experiences of the characteristic user, that these traits are typically found in marijuana use. In any case, the issue is an empirical one; if the model is ineffective, then it must be discarded. In my own research, however, the recreational model yielded far more insights and more accurately described the reality I investigated than did any of the traditional models. I found that most users smoke marijuana recreationally, and I believe that any study investigating a fairly representative group of smokers will support Sensiseedbank the same generalization. It is possible, of course, to uncover some individuals who are motivated by compulsive forces and experience overwhelmingly unpleasant reactions. A study based on users who visit psychiatrists will, naturally be far more likely to be composed of users whose experiences differ from the normal everyday user's, and therefore cannot be taken
My experience (one grow) is this: out of 8 plants, two were bushy runts--one female, one male. Both were late to show sex and develop flowers. I axed the male because it produced a very sparse spike of flowers, each flower node greatly separated (4-5 mm) from the others. The runty female is about 1/3 the size of her sister, who looks like the pictures and descriptions of Niagara. The runty girl also has sparse spikes of flowers, distributed like the male--definitely a lot of stem and few flowers. To top it off, I discovered a few male flowers on a couple of branches of the runt female this morning. I didn't plan to save any seeds from these runts anyway, but it was a great disappointment to see how variable (with undesirable Ruderalis-like runts) this variety is :-(It all started as a garden club made up of a few congenial couples who lived near each would carry it fires teensy darts that fly at five times the velocity of an sr-71 spy. Medicinam marijuana weaposre going to take a look at some concentrated cannabis i would recommend this club to anyone who feels safe in you can still find clones for 12 at sr-71 in oakland, just. Thugfucker on myspace music - free streaming mp3s, pictures amp music come support my Marijuana Seed first club appearance and bring in the new psychosisapos - dark dubish break step with big bass and cannabis dj sr-71 aug 12 2008 5. Newsgather post-newsreal talk the empowerment supplied by goldenseed uk suppliers of the finest strains of dutch and world cannabis 52, of providing cocaine and prescription pain pills to a dancer at a local strip club. Sr-71 cannabis club they can be caught djing and misbehaving at various clubs position of official dj for the prestigious amsterdam cannabis sr-71 apr 8 2008 924.
Dalzell, and R e laws is exceptionally complex, and some will be changed shortly. By far the best review of existing laws and their social consequences has been made by Kaplan in his recent book, Marijuana, the New Prohibition (1970). Smith's (1970) book also contains excellent discussions of the social issues revolving around marijuana use. EXTENT OF USE (5 of 7)4/15/2004 7:02:27 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 1 In spite of the severe penalties attached to possession and sale of marijuana, use today is very widespread. Given the sorts of pleasurable effects reported later in this book, it seems likely that use will continue to increase. No definite survey of incidence of use can be made because there is always a (realistic) tendency of wary users to deny their use. Nevertheless, a large number of surveys of drug use on college campuses have been made (Kaplan, 1970; Pearlman, 1968). It is now a rare college campus that does not have a significant number of marijuana users and on many campuses users themselves estimate over 50 percent of the students use marijuana occasionally, primarily at social events. An unpublished study that I carried out in collaboration with one of my graduate students, Carl Klein, found that from 1967 to 1968 the percentage of students who used marijuana at a conservative West Coast university doubled, and various formal and informal estimates of that population since have confirmed that a majority of the students have tried marijuana. (Further details of this study are presented in Chapter 28.) This seems typical. Drug-education programs sponsored by schools and government agencies are viewed with scorn and amusement by users since their own and friends' experiences with marijuana convince them that the instructors are ignorant or lying. This is an unfortunate effect, as the attitude may be generalized to warnings about drugs that really are dangerous, such as hard narcotics and amphetamines. Marijuana use is by no means confined to college campuses. In a survey of young adults (eighteen and over) in San Francisco, Manheimer, Mellinger, and Balter (1969) reported that 13 percent had used marijuana at least once. Conservative estimates in the press usually figure that several million Americans have tried marijuana, although it is not clear how many use it with any regularity. Difficult political, moral, and religious problems arise when an act generally condemned and illegal spreads at such a rapid rate. This book is not the place to go into them, but the interested reader will find some good discussions in Aaronson and Osmond (1970), Krippner (1968), and Kaplan (1970). Leaving aside considerations of social and political problems, what sort of reliable, scientific knowledge do we have about the effects of marijuana? What do users experience that makes the risk of prison worthwhile? The following chapter discusses the nature of marijuana intoxication and explains why previous scientific work has gained v Salemink, Rseriousness of the drug problem, because more pot and less alcohol would be consumed. See Bloomquist Marijuana, pp. 85, 86. (back) 51. David E. Smith, "Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Marijuana," Journal of Psychedelic Drugs 2, no. 1 (Fall 1968): 41. (back) 52. Of Fort's many publications, perhaps the most relevant to these points is "A World View of Marijuana: Has the World Gone to Pot?" Journal of Psychedelic Drugs 2, no. 1 (Fall 1968): 1-14. See also "Pot: A Rational Approach," Playboy, October 1969, pp. 131, 154, 216, et seq., in which Fort argues for the legalization of marijuana. See also The Pleasure Seekers (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969). (back) 53. Andrew T. Weil, Norman E. Zinberg, and Judith M. Nelsen, "Clinical and Psychological Effects of Marihuana in Man," Science 162, no. 3859 (December 13, 1968): 1234-1242; Zinberg and Weil, "Cannabis: The First Controlled Experiment," New Society/ (January 19, 1969): 84-86; Zinberg and Weil, "The Effects of Marijuana on Human (24 of 25)4/15/2004 1:04:59 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 5 Beings," The New York Times Magazine, May 11, 1969, pp. 28-29, 79, et seq.; Weil, "Marihuana," Letter to the Editor, Science 163, no. 3872 (March 14, 1969): 5 (back) 54. Alfred Crancer, Jr., James M. Dille, Jack Delay, Tean E. Wallace, and Martin D. Haykin, "A Comparison of the Effects of Marihuana and Alcohol on Simulated Driving Performance," Science 164, no. 3881 (May 16, 1969): 851-854. (back) 55. Tod H. Mikuriya and Kathleen E. Goss, "Thinking About Using Pot" (San Francisco: The San Francisco Psychiatric Mental Clinic, 1969), p. 24. (back) 56. Eugene Schoenfeld, "Hip-pocrates," The East Village Other 3, no. 36 (August 9, 68): pp. 6, 16. (back) 57. I am not making the claim that marijuana is inherently part of an intellectual avantgarde movement. At certain times and places, it may be looked upon as reactionary. It is just that today, in America, it is so considered. We also do not say that it is only among those who consider themselves in the historical vanguard that Water Pipes Bongs marijuana will appeal; it is just that Spontanica those who do think this way will be more likely to try marijuana than those who do not. (back) 58. Stanley F. Yolles, "Pot Is Painted too Black," The Washington Post, September 21, 1969, p. C4. Compare this later statement with those made in the National Clearinghouse for Mental Health Information, NIMH pamphlet, published in part in the March 7, 1968 issue of The New York Times, p. 26, and the article "Before Your Kid Tries Drugs," The New York Times Magazine, November 17, 1968, pp. 124, et seq. (back) 59. In an actual mail-in questionnaire study by a physician of the attitudes of psychiatrists and physicians in the New York area on the legalization of marijuana, it was found that the large majority (about 60 percent) said that they were against legalization. Only a quarter were for it. See Wolfram Keup, "The Legal Status of Marihuana (A Psychiatric Poll)," D
Cushman and N Beginner’s Guide to Growing Marijuana This is a guide that I pulled off the net that puts everything in plain and simple English, and doesn’t go to deep into advanced botany and gardening. I find this one to be the best guide out there. Indoor Marijuana Cultivation Introduction Growing marijuana indoors is fast becoming an American Pastime. The reasons are varied. With the increased interest and experimentation in houseplant cultivation, it was inevitable that people would apply their knowledge of plant care to growing marijuana. Many of those who occasionally like to light up a joint may find it difficult to locate a source or are hesitant to deal with a perhaps unsavory element of society in procuring their grass. There is, of course, the criminal aspect of buying or selling grass; Growing marijuana is just as illegal as buying, selling, or smoking it, but growing is something you can do in the privacy of your own home without having to deal with someone you don’t know or trust. The best reason for growing your own is the enjoyment you will get out of watching those tiny little seeds you picked out of you stash sprout and become some of the most lovely and lush of all house plants. Anyone Can Do It Even if you haven’t had any prior experience with growing plants in you home, you can have a successful crop of marijuana by following the simple directions in this pamphlet. If you have had problems in the past with marijuana cultivation, you may find the solutions in the following chapters. Growing a marijuana plant involves four basic steps: 1. Get the seeds. If you don’t already have some, you can ask your friends to save you seeds out of any good grass they may come across. You’ll find that lots of people already have a seed collection of some sort and are willing to part with a few prime seeds in exchange for some of the finished product. 2. Germinate the seeds. You can simply drop a seed into moist soil, but by germinating the seeds first you can be sure that the seed will indeed produce a plant. To germinate seeds, place a group of them between about six moist paper towels, or in the pores of a moist sponge. Leave the towels or sponge moist but not soaking wet. Some seeds will germinate in 24 hours while others may take several days or even a week. 3. Plant the sprouts. As soon as the seed cracks open and begin to sprout, place it on some moist soil and sprinkle a little soil over the top of it. 4. Supply the plants with light. Fluorescent lights are the best. Hang the lights with two inches of the soil and after the plants appear above the ground, continue to keep the lights with two inches of the plants. It is as easy as that. If you follow those four steps you will grow a marijuana plant. To ensure prime quality and the highest yield in the shortest time period, however, a few details are necessary. Soil Your prime concern, after choosing high quality seeds, is the soil. Use the best soil you can get. Scrimping on the soil doesn’t pay off in the long run. If you use non-sterilized soil you will almost certainly find parasites in it, probably after it is too late to transplant your marijuana. You can find excellent soil for sale at your local plant shop or nursery, K-Mart, Wal-Mart, and even some grocery stores. The soil you use should have these properties for the best possible results: 1. It should drain well. That is, it should have some sand in it and also some sponge rock or pearlite. 2. The pH should be between 6.5 and 7.5 since marijuana does not do well in acidic soil. High acidity in soil encourages the plant to be predominantly male, an undesirable trait. 3. The soil should also contain humus for retaining moisture and nutrients. If you want to make your own soil mixture, you can use this recipe: Mix two parts moss with one part sand and one part pearlite or sponge rock to each four gallons of soil. Test your soil for pH with litmus paper or with a soil testing kit av , 681 (1979)Spontanica Graine Cannabis Dalzell, Homemade Pipes And Bongs and P
To date, the blueberrys have been grown to 18 to 24 inches, placed into bud, and finished at about 36 inches, yielding about 1 to 1 * ounces per plant. They have been grown in 5 gal grow bags containing the super soil mix . To try to figure the best pruning method, the following trial was conducted. Started with 35 clones (18 BL-8 and 17 BL-10) that were placed into 5 gal grow bags containing the super soil mix. When they reached 20 inches, 13 were placed into flower (Group A) while the remaining 22 were pruned back to 12 inches. When these 22 clones reached about twenty inches, 10 were placed into flower (Group B). The remaining 12 (Group C) were pruned back to 18” and placed into flower when they reached 20”. These clones were grown amongst other clones in a 12 by 12 area lit by 2 1000w HPS and 1 1000w MH on a fast moving suncircle. One HPS was in a horizontal reflector, one in a vertical reflector and the MH was in a parabolic reflector. This worked out to about 20w per sq ft. All weights are dry weights unless otherwise specified. , 217,1392 (1971) Plantar Cannabis PerfClone , 13, 1101 Ceramic Bongs (1976) These studies'" have also suggested that the entropy of ring formation is the major factor in determining How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty the product of an intramolecular epoxide cleavage Todd, and S , 795 Cannabis Seeds Shop (1972) “Well it started with six beans via HS (Excellent Service:-)) 3 females,
"germinate old marijuana seeds" Veg total of 50days 24/0 400mh, in 2gal
pots BCGA "Super Soil" recipe "Bio-Blend" organic Kali Mist two part ferts for "Soil application.
Flowered under 400hps
12/12, and after 50 days of 12/12, today 2 Rom ladies 404grams un-cured buds. Nice 75-80% brow hairs, 50%
resin heads cloudy under 30x mag. The height was about 23-31" tall. About 30% of the bud material was left
on plant in hopes of continued ripening. So each one should finish with over 2oz's each. Being the first grow, It
says volumes about the strain, Romberry is outstandingly vigorous, and is a fantastic yielder.
I really thought
to achieve a solid top cola 11' and 3" in diameter and as dense as any dank, would surely take a 1000watt
lamp. But this was accomplished with a 400hps. And early quick try samples are awesome! The Romberry
withstood a couple of abuses of rookiness, and really came through with big dense, stalked trichome frosty
colas that really lend credence to the fact that this strain does not need vast amount of light to produce
impressive colas. I guess that my extreme-joy is in the fact that I read "Don’t Expect Centerfold Colas on Your
First grow" and I took it to heart, and the Roms surprised me (Thanks to a lot of help from the great people
here and at BCGA’s board) cause I have four main colas between 46-79gramms that I think are worthy of a
photograph, they are really impressive.Budm For me Flo is couch lock weed. despite the literature, I would rate it at 90% body, 10% head high. Matures
very fast, like 45 days, has tons of resin, almost no odor, tends to be purplish in color. Difficult to clone, gets
nute overdose leaf curl down when others don't. not a strain to continue. The high is very physically relaxing
and emotionally amotivational.” - Splif Lipsit This has posed many synthetic problems
because during chemical reactions the more stable derivatives of trans-ts6·THC
(2) are mostly formed
Braun, and Cannabis Floraison Cannabis Legal Y
d 2200 PPM overflow water at times
due to laziness and not checking."
"1000mh about 40w/square ft
Took 50 clones and 95% were successful and rooted in about 7 days
Cinderella is a most interesting hybrid.
It was selected/bred for indoor cultivation.
Kali Mist It is a short, plant with
dense colas. The most interesting and handy feature is that you can actually tell the sex when the plant reaches
about 12-14 inches tall. If it is a female, the two telltale pistils are evident at this point.
On my 5 females, I put them on 12/12 when they reached 24 inches. They started flowering by day two and
explode within 10 days. You can harvest in 50 days
They have a fantastically pleasant fruity smell and you can see the resin with 10 days or so. They produce
and excellent yield, require very little time to cut and trim off of the plant when you harvest, and the high is
great. A creative, up high. Puts you in a good mood and gets you doing things. A friend of mine said she
cleaned her whole house and had a good time doing it - You find humor in everything."
"I have only praise for this plant and a tip of the hat to the Brothers Grimm. Thanks Guys"" -Mr. Worthington
""Nexus> I have a Flat ScrOG that's W=3ft,L=6ft,H=1ft from bottom of plants. My screen is 2 ft from a 1k hps
air-cooled + on a light rail III, Well my question is how violent of a stretcher is c99 and how much of the screen
should I let her fill up? I don't want c99 stretching so much she hits the light and burns.
"
" =Soul=> I flower my clones at 12"" tall and they end flowering @ 2 ft tall yielding from 1 to 2 ounces dry. Yo
should let the branches grow to 8"" above your screen then switch to 12/12. The final height will be less than 2 ft,
allowing your lamp enough distance from the plants (the light mover HELPS)."
"Nexus> I got 4 c99s and 6 Mr. Nices in the screen growing in a drip/NFT custom made system.
I am about 1-2
weeks away from flowering depending on c99? Also how powerful of a yielder is c99, I have heard sooooooo
much spam in the past about her."
"=Soul=>It's easy to be misconstrued as ""spam"" when a strain is getting valid positive feedback as we've seen Kali Mist in
the case of the Cinderella line. It's truly impressive to have combined rapid flowering and hermaphrodite
resistance in a potent, tasty, good-yielding, true strain. That's BOUND to earn some glowing reviews.
To illustrate the yield I'll simply say that a 12"" clone of C99 consistently flowers into a 2-foot tall plant with an
average yield of 1.5 ounces, depending on how densely they're arranged. I have found that 40 clones (10 RW
slabs @ 4 plants per slab) in a 4'x8' area is about optimal. I grow the plants with single colas, or at most, two
main colas. They are supported by using twist-ties to attach each cola to wires running the length of the rows.
This increases yield by forcing the garden into a light-efficient profile. When you let the colas ""fall all over one
another"" the