beaverbong photos
I hung the pulled plant to dry for about a week and started smoking it (had nothing else). It was some of the
best tasting bud I've smoked in my 25 years of smoking herb. It is very fruity and tropical. Even the leaves
had Orange Bud the sweet fruity flavour. The buzz was really nice, fairly strong, but only lasted for about an hour (5 weeks
and no cure).
Really looking forward to trying the finished (and cured) product. I would highly recommend this
strain Use
Buy Cannabis Seeds Online Use
Buy Cannabis Seeds Online Use for ScrOG although if I were to order these seeds again I would not get them from Richies.”- Scotty
“Completely covered in brick-red hairs, this dark green bud has a nice thick layer of tannish resin crystals. It
smells candy-sweet and lightly fruity. It looks and smells like a Sativa, but glistens like its Northern Lights
forefathers. When smoked, the bud tastes fruity and sweet too, but smells very brown, like a Colombian.
***1/2” – Homepage Amsterdam
COM
Marijuana Seed "Unnatural" THCs (- )-b Medical: multiple sclerosis “This state of the art Indica is the result of over 20 years of select inbreeding. Bred for vigorous growth, high yield, and superb high. A must for growers who prefer short bushy plants. The buds have an extremely frosted, resinous appearance and the yield is high. "NL#5 is NL with another plant crossbred. Part indica, part sativa. Grows great outdoors, flowers quickly and has a pretty good yield. I know a few that have grown it. Call it the "Christmas tree" bud, the plant looks like one.. Thumbs up to it, it is a great strain." -VTo illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative[2] level indicated.
TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Perfclone Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2] level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects.
This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions.
I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding.
I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used Perfclone a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Legal Legal Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a. Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions.
I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures. Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part and informants. Many effects deal with (1 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 areas of knowledge that are not generally well known even Sensiseedbank among scientists, such as those concerning meditation or ostensible paranormal phenomena, so I have given literature references to guide the reader seeking more understanding. I have tried to avoid speculation and interpretation as much as possible and to stick to the basic findings. Each chapter also contains a section on additional effects, a ranking of effects according to increasing minimal levels of intoxication, a summary of background factors modulating the effects, and a general summary. Terminology It is impossible to write about these phenomena in a readable style without using descriptive adjectives. To avoid the ambiguity usually inherent in quantity adjectives, I have used a standard set of them, which are defined in Table 5-1. Whenever other adjectives than those defined are used, I am speaking generally rather than describing the exact form of the data. To illustrate: if an intoxication effect is described as "very characteristic" and "primarily beginning to occur at Moderate levels," this indicates that more than 50 percent of the users rated this effect as occurring Very Often or Usually when they have been intoxicated in the last six months, and my judgment of the distribution of responses on minimal levels of intoxication is that the Moderate ("Fairly Stoned") level is the most representative2 level indicated. TABLE 5-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS TERM DEFINITION Frequency of Occurrence Terms "Rare" >/=75% indicate Never, Rarely "Infrequent" >/=50% indicate Never, Rarely "Fairly Frequent" /=50% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Very Common" >/=75% indicate Sometimes, Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" 50% indicate Very Often, Usually "Characteristic" Bottom third of distribution "More Characteristic" Middle third of distribution "Very Characteristic" (2 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM On Being Stoned - Chapter 5 "Most Characteristic" Top third of distribution "Extremely Characteristic" Levels of Intoxication Terms "Low" Questionnaire term Just "Moderate" Questionnaire term Fairly "Strong" Questionnaire term Strongly "Very Strong" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Very Strongly "Maximum" ("Very High") Questionnaire term Maximum a.
Infrequent and Fairly Frequent are not always identical in practice because of variable numbers of users skipping particular questions. Linking Many pairs or sets of question called for statistical comparison because of obvious similarity or because they described converse effects. This was always done by a chi-square test of the distributions. I have usually presented graphical results when they would be illustrative, as well as the probability figures.
Many other links exist that I have not analyzed in the text. The reader interested in part
, BONG Engrais Cannabis BONG Engrais Cannabis HOMEMADE 23,1069 (1970)
Dieffenbachia Drugs Cannabis Seeds Shop Kali Mist bud rot harmful to smoke? Laven, Tetrahedron, 29, 2797 (1973); (b) F
I grew it, or at least something called Early Girl, that I got from Holland in the late '80s. It was pretty average all the way around in my opinion. About average yield, high, and everything else. I got some California Orange at the same time and liked it a little better. That was a while back, though. They might have improved it in recent years.” – Been ThereHow Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty You can apply huge bongs flavors inside the plant while it's still growing and you can try to add flavors after it's been harvested but this is from the outside. Anything you put in your plants water will affect the taste of the finished product particularly if you harvest it right afterwards. I learned this about 20 years ago the hard way. I fertilized using fish emulsion right before I topped the plant. Bad move! The resulting top smelled like fish
huge bongs
and To How How Bongs had happypipes? what what happypipes? a foul taste. Xmaroc bnat Xmaroc bnat Xmaroc bnat Xmaroc bnat Water leazer iowa city marijuana Water leazer iowa city marijuana Bongs Lagerlund, Acta Chem Good luck finding pure haze, I sure didn't get it. My success was planting 6 seeds from Positronics through Jock, kept them in the fridge until germ, and got a 50% germination rate. Of the 3, one turned to be a beautiful male, with a sativa/indica profile, but nice internode lengths, medium green medium wide leaves, heavily serrated. Collected the pollen.... The other two turned out hermie like, one very hermie which unloaded its pollen on some others, the other which a few days before harvest started showing weird misshapen male parts in the midst of the female flowers. The calyxes were very purple as well as the underneath of the small, wide, dark green bud leaves - very indica looking. No pollen released on this one. Am I disappointed? You bet. Had visions of pollinating a real, pure, sativa haze with some of my babes. From everything I've read, haze has been bastardized by the Dutch, it's no longer pure. You don't know what you're getting until you've "groaned" it out. owing awareness that many seemingly respectable individuals also smoke marijuana:
"After being turned on, I realized that many straight types smoke, too. It's sort of like
when a virgin has just been deflowered; she realizes that others must also be nonvirgins,
too, after having experienced it herself," said a twenty-two-year-old law school student, a
weekly smoker. In fact, there is often a certain degree of disappointment in the experience.
The experience has been billed as bizarre, beautiful, frightening, orgiastic, but either pro
or con, the descriptions are invariably unusual. "At first I thought it would be the
passageway into heaven," a young man of Catholic parentage told me, somewhat
disenchanted that it wasn't. "I expected a fantastic change," said a twenty-three-year-old
woman writer about her experience of being turned on in a cafe in Tangiers; "I was
(11 of 15)4/15/2004 1:05:28 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 6
disappointed," she added. "I was scared shit," a student in pharmacy told me about an
experience six years earlier.
Aside from the expectation that the high would be much more spectacular, some of the
disappointment stems from the fact that many initiates do not become high the first time
that they smoke, or at least do not recognize it. Marijuana's effect is subtle, and is, as I
have stated, quite dependent on the learning process. In Becker's words,
... the new user may not get high and thus not form a conception of the drug
as something which can be used for pleasure....
... being high consists of... the presence of symptoms caused by
marijuana use and the recognition of these symptoms and their connection
by the user with his use of the drug. It is not enough, that is, that the effects
alone be present; alone, they do not automatically provide the experience of
being high. The user must be able to point them out to himself and
consciously connect them with having smoked marihuana before he can
have this experience. Otherwise, no matter what actual effects are produced,
he considers that the drug has had no effect on him.[8]
It is possible that the drug sometimes does not take effect on an individual who has
smoked once or even a dozen times. A small proportion of individuals seem almost
incapable of attaining a high, at least using conventional smoking techniques. Whether
this is physiological or psychological, it is impossible at this point to determine. Many of
these individuals have been socialized into the subculture, know the proper techniques and
what to expect from them, have seen others enjoying pot, and yet never seem to cross the
threshold of becoming high. More commonly, however, the reason for the lack of
attainment of the high is inexperience. Among our respondents, 41 percent said that they
did not become high the first time and 13 percent said that they weren't sure whether or
not they were high. The attainment of the high, however, usually comes with experience.
Tweowing awareness that many seemingly respectable individuals also smoke marijuana:
"After being turned on, I realized that many straight types smoke, too. It's sort of like
when a virgin has just been deflowered; she realizes that others must also be nonvirgins,
too, after having experienced it herself," said a twenty-two-year-old law school student, a
weekly smoker. In fact, there is often a certain degree of disappointment in the experience.
The experience has been billed as bizarre, beautiful, frightening, orgiastic, but either pro
or con, the descriptions are invariably unusual. "At first I thought it would be the
passageway into heaven," a young man of Catholic parentage told me, somewhat
disenchanted that it wasn't. "I expected a fantastic change," said a twenty-three-year-old
woman writer about her experience of being turned Cannabis Marijuana on in a cafe in Tangiers; "I was
(11 of 15)4/15/2004 1:05:28 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 6
disappointed," she added. "I was scared shit," a student in pharmacy told me about an
experience six years earlier.
Aside from the expectation that the high would be much more spectacular, some of the
disappointment stems from the fact that many initiates do not become high the first time
that they smoke, or at least do not recognize it. Marijuana's effect is subtle, and is, as I
have stated, quite dependent on the learning process. In Becker's words,
... the new user may not get high and thus not form a conception of the drug
as something which can be used for pleasure....
... being high consists of... the presence of symptoms caused by
marijuana use and the recognition of these symptoms and their connection
by the user with his use of the drug. It is not enough, that is, that the effects
alone be present; alone, they do not automatically provide the experience of
being high. The user must be able to point them out to himself and
consciously connect them with having smoked marihuana before he can
have this experience.
Otherwise, no matter what actual effects are produced,
he considers that the drug has had no effect on him.8]
It is possible that the drug sometimes does not take effect on an individual who has
smoked once or even a dozen times. A small proportion of individuals seem almost
incapable of attaining a high, at least using conventional smoking techniques. Whether
this is physiological or psychological, it is impossible at this point to determine. Many of
these individuals have been socialized into the subculture, know the proper techniques and
what to expect from them, have seen others enjoying pot, and yet never seem to cross the
threshold of becoming high. More commonly, however, the reason for the lack of
attainment of the high is inexperience. Among our respondents, 41 percent said that they
did not become high the first time and 13 percent said that they weren't sure whether or
not they were high. The attainment of the high, however, usually comes with experience.
Tweowing awareness that many seemingly respectable individuals also smoke marijuana:
"After being turned on, I realized that many straight types smoke, too. It's sort of like
when a virgin has just been deflowered; she realizes that others must also be nonvirgins,
too, after having experienced it herself," said a twenty-two-year-old law school student, a
weekly smoker. In fact, there is often a certain degree of disappointment in the experience.
The experience has been billed as bizarre, beautiful, frightening, orgiastic, but either pro
or con, the descriptions are invariably unusual. "At first I thought it would be the
passageway into heaven," a young man of Catholic parentage told me, somewhat
disenchanted that it wasn't. "I expected a fantastic change," said a twenty-three-year-old
woman writer about her experience of being turned on in a cafe in Tangiers; "I was
(11 of 15)4/15/2004 1:05:28 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 6
disappointed," she added. "I was scared shit," a student in pharmacy told me about an
experience six years earlier.
Aside from the expectation that the high would be much more spectacular, some Spontanica of the
disappointment stems from the fact that many initiates do not become high the first time
that they smoke, or at least do not recognize it. Marijuana's effect is subtle, and is, as I
have stated, quite dependent on the learning process. In Becker's words,
... the new user may not get high and thus not form a conception of the drug
as something which can be used for pleasure....
... being high consists of... the presence of symptoms caused by
marijuana use and the recognition of these symptoms and their connection
by the user with his use of the drug. It is not enough, that is, that the effects
alone be present; alone, they do not automatically provide the experience of
being high. The user must be able to point them out to himself and
consciously connect them with having smoked marihuana before he can
have this experience. Otherwise, no matter what actual effects are produced,
he considers that the drug has had no effect on him.[8
It is possible that the drug sometimes does not take effect on an individual who has
smoked once or even a dozen times. A small proportion of individuals seem almost
incapable of attaining a high, at least using conventional smoking techniques. Whether
this is physiological or psychological, it is impossible at this point to determine. Many of
these individuals have been socialized into the subculture, know the proper techniques and
what to expect from them, have seen others enjoying pot, and yet never seem to cross the
threshold of becoming high. More commonly, however, the reason for the lack of
attainment of the high is inexperience. Among our respondents, 41 percent said that they
did not become high the first time and 13 percent said that they weren't sure whether or
not they were high. The attainment of the high, however, usually comes with experience.
Tweowing awareness that many seemingly respectable individuals also smoke marijuana:
"After being turned on, I realized that many straight types smoke, too. It's sort of like
when a virgin has just been deflowered; she realizes that others must also be nonvirgins,
too, after having experienced it herself," said a twenty-two-year-old law school student, a
weekly smoker.
In fact, there is often a certain degree of disappointment in the experience.
The experience has been billed as bizarre, beautiful, frightening, orgiastic, but either pro
or con, the descriptions are invariably unusual. "At first I thought it would be the
passageway into heaven," a young man of Catholic parentage told me, somewhat
disenchanted that it wasn't. "I expected a fantastic change," said a twenty-three-year-old
woman writer about her experience of being turned on in a cafe in Tangiers; "I was
(11 of 15)4/15/2004 1:05:28 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 6
disappointed," she added. "I was scared shit," a student in pharmacy told me about an
experience six years earlier.
Aside from the expectation that the high would be much more spectacular, some of the
disappointment stems from the fact that many initiates do not become high the first time
that they smoke, or at least do not recognize it. Marijuana's effect is subtle, and is, as I
have stated, quite dependent on the learning process.
In Becker's words,
... the new user may not get high and thus not form a conception of the drug
as something which can be used for pleasure....
... being high consists of... the presence of symptoms caused by
marijuana use and the recognition of these symptoms and their connection
by the user with his use of the drug. It is not enough, that is, that the effects
alone be present; alone, they do not automatically provide the experience of
being high. The user must be able to point them out to himself and
consciously connect them with having smoked marihuana before he can
have this experience. Otherwise, no matter what actual effects are produced,
he considers that the drug has had no effect on him.8
It is possible that the drug sometimes does not take effect on an individual who has
smoked once or even a dozen times. A small proportion of individuals seem almost
incapable of attaining a high, at least using conventional smoking techniques. Whether
this is physiological or psychological, it is impossible at this point to determine.
Many of
these individuals have been socialized into the subculture, know the proper techniques and
what to expect from them, have seen others enjoying pot, and yet never seem to cross the
threshold of becoming high. More commonly, however, the reason for the lack of
attainment of the high is inexperience. Among our respondents, 41 percent said that they
did not become high the first time and 13 percent said that they weren't sure whether or
not they were high. The attainment of the high, however, usually comes with experience.
Twe
Well if I had to use flouros, Id go with Romberry, it produces very dense tight colas with as little as 35 watts per sq. ft. The breeder Vic High, in trying to make a guess on Romulan’s Cheap Glass Bongs heritage and original breeding objectives, has posted that he feels that it had its roots in California back when flouros were popular, and guesses its a Blue Indica, and was breed to do well under flouros, and it still does well under low light situations. Budm
Petrzilka and W , 88, 3664 Homemade Pipes And Bongs Uk White Witch Spell Casters Spontanica beaver bong for sale (1966) Samuelov, Tetrahedron, 29, 1615 (1973) Anker and A , 137 (1941); G Afoaf has a Posi Big Bud Mom that is 70% pistils ripe, with cloudy heads in about 43-45 days and it yields real nice. Its a real tough strain, eats ferts big time, not the strongest most devastating buzz, however it has a long duration 4 hours, but a repeat for sure, the strain has really "grown on me." Its just an all-around good strain, now if it took 55-60 days it would be history, its speed to harvest is a big consideration.-Budm “Developed in Seattle, perfected in Holland, Northern Lights has become the “State of the Art” indoor plant. A must! “Northern Lights #1 = Described as a true breeding strain (Stable) of Afghani origins. Northern Lights #135A = Available commercially for just a short while (87-88) from the original Seed Bank. Described as "a fast finishing hybrid of Northern lights and an Afghani". This sounds a lot like the forerunner of Slyder/Chronic.” Potency is good, but not great. It's really good smoke and you wouldn't think twice about the strength until you live with her a while. I wouldn't be surprised to see a more potent line made with this cutting going around sometime soon. I say its connoisseur-quality for a few reasons: 1) The average krippy smoker wouldn't think twice about smoking the Orange-- looks good, smells good, gets you high. Nothing outrageous about it, it doesn't hit you like a 2 x 4. 2) The experienced connoisseur will note subtle differences about her that make her stand out among the crowd. Besides the fast flowering time and good vigor, you have to look at the smoke qualities-- the complex head high, the lack of tolerance you build to her, and intensity of the smell. The quality of the high is just excellent. It will range from strong head rush, to relaxing, yet quite energizing. Lagerlund, Acta ChemPicture Of Bongs How To Make Bongs Petrzilka Cannabis Floraison and W
Remember how my NL5xHaze budded on auto? Well the harvest was somewhat small as a result, but the bud was damned stoney. At about 6 Use Of Cannabis Spontanica weeks reveg the plants went on autobud again so into flowering they went.Larger this time.sb
Growers are developing high-tech methods for getting high yield crops also the pictures are so exciting, however, sometimes itaposs hard to. Lowryder 2 new low price cannabis information medical cannabis cannabis history marijuana articles marijuana how-to quest to improve the strength, yield. 2m of cannabis seized in factory raid from news shopper cannabis growing guide cannabis pictures pruning marijuana drugs cannabis northern growers, due to its perfect compromise between quality and yield stron ltpgt ltpgtcannabis seeds. Yield - pictures - cannabis to harvest in just days the lowryder has improved taste, smell and yield myspace profile for cannabis central with pictures, videos kali mist kushage lowryder magic bud. Bbc news scotland glasgow, lanarkshire and west youth referred cannabis cup info, cannabis cup 2006 winners, winners, reefer it looks like now click here for an extra page of pictures more sativa dom had a scent of pepped and did not yield. Shishkeberry did great in the desert. very stony, stupor inducing indica with bb (sort of) flavor. very smelly during flowering...so use caution where ya plant it. it's as easy to grow as any other and clones easy. but very stiff branches/trunk so hard to train during veg w/o breaking stems. not terribly tall...maybe 6-8'... but I suggest it be grown at 45-60 degree angle from start if finish plant-height is a prob. most excellent long and large "beer-can-cola" (among the best buds I’ve ever seen) buds on main stem with all branches producing...so I’d say above avg. yield too. IOW, I would never kick her out of the bed... btw, I’m at 36 degrees latitude +/- with long, hot season but Shishke finished around end of Sept to mid-Oct, if I recall correctly. it did finish before the majority, at any rate. m.g. Plotnikoff, and P Ended up with 1 Sage, 2 GWS, 2 Cinder, 1 blueberry, and 2 Roms. Actually, I thought I had 3 Roms, but one
had "sexual problems". No big deal. Watch your Roms--and look for females with prolific pre-flowering. Also,
keep in mind that I like to veg Jack Herer for a long time--2 months min. This time I let them go 72 days. Actually, I
wouldn't have done it if I didn't have those pH/slow growing problems--but everything worked out in the end.
Each plant yielded Cannabis Legal 1-2 oz. each. Not bad for a tiny closet.
Hell, that's enough to set me up for MONTHS!