blown glass bongs
Mostly Indica (F1 hybrid) with exceptionally broad leaves. Lots of resin on leaves as well as flowers, with a
musky hash like aroma. Strong physical high. Yields are above average. Short rounded plants.
The reported beneficial qual1t1es of cannabus as a medicine have been knonw for centuries. Medicinal cannabus was flist wirtten abotu by the Ancient Chinese in Sheen Nung's Pen Ts'ao in 2737BC. The Roman sugeon Floraison
seed Floraison Dioscorides also praised its curing irtues in 70AD hylst the English hebralit Culpeper who wrote a handmaid's tale abotu it in the Complete Herbal and English Physician. Cannabis was takin widely for its curing classic automobile value restaurants open until 3am, chester, va the 20th Century when is the Culture Cannabis last day of summer it was stigmatised and eventually banned.
BC Big Bud has tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture #18 (Steve Kubby header), and a citrusy bongs and bowls scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the crosses, its usually the female in those Romulan x BC Big Bud or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40 US for 10 seeds.
Giant seeds, largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has no relevance despite what mythology persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the Spontanica high is superior in the BC Big Bud version. The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.” – Marc Emery“BC Big Bud is a stabilized 65% indica/35% sativa, the Dutch Big Bud (Sensi) is all indica. BC Big Bud has tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture 18 (Steve Kubby header), and a citrusy scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the crosses, its usually the female in those Romulan x BC Big Bud or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40
how to grow a marajawana plant
US for 10 seeds. Giant seeds, largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has no relevance despite what mythology persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the high is superior in the BC Big Bud version.The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.” – Marc Emery
Making Bongs
1-THC Nabiione (Lilly) Nabitan (SP-I06) (Burroughs Wellcome) CH2C=CH I (:11: ;(oU9H-{CH,h-{}F CH3 A41988 Making Bongs Nirvana Cannabis Seeds (Abbott) OH CP44001-1 (Pfizer) DMHP Chart 6 nto a criminal into "the kind of person who would do such a thing." Although many going through the ritual will reject the definition of them imposed by the process, it nonetheless leaves its impress. Formal Law, Substantive Law, and Law Enforcement A common argument against marijuana use involves its legal status. Aside from the debate concerning its dangers, or lack thereof, to the human mind and body, the single irreducible fact regarding marijuana which is universally agreed upon is that its use, possession, and sale are illegal. The opponents of marijuana use this as an effective weapon in their dialogue with the drug's advocates. Regardless of one's point of view on marijuana, it is outlawed. Everyone who uses it is a criminal, someone subject to the risk of arrest and imprisonment who should expect to be punished. Actually, this argument fails under close scrutiny. Many laws— perhaps most laws—are not enforced. Formal law, law as it exists on the books, is very different from substantive law, law as it is actually enforced. The breach of some laws engenders widespread moral outrage, while the enforcement of other laws incurs that same public wrath. "It's the law" can never be an excuse for sanctioning an act, because "the law" is a hodge-podge of archaic long-forgotten, and ignored statutes that are never executed, along with those that are respected and daily enforced. Masturbation is illegal in a number of states (Pennsylvania, for instance), and in Indiana and Wyoming, it is criminal to encourage a person to masturbate. In forty-five states, adultery is illegal; Connecticut calls for five-year imprisonment upon prosecution. Mere fornication is a crime in thirty-eight states, and a breach of this law theoretically carries a fine of $500 or two-years (15 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11 imprisonment, or both.28] Many states dictate the manner in which one may make love to one's spouse; cunnilingus and fellatio, for instance, are against the law in many legal jurisdictions.29] In view of the near-universality of masturbation among men and the fact that a majority of all couples marrying today engaged in premarital intercourse, the virtual absence of any prosecution for these crimes is remarkable. Although sanctioning all crimes without victims entails severe problems of logistical detection, with adultery at least, divorce suits constitute a fertile field. In New York state, where until recently adultery was the only legitimate grounds for divorce, thousands of divorces have been filed and granted in the past few years, yet almost no one is ever prosecuted for this crime. 30] The enforcement of certain laws, therefore, cannot be taken for granted. Enforcement is problematic. Thus, when a law is enforced, it is necessary to ask why. What is it that differentiates those laws that are enforced and those that are not enforced? The argument that a man should refrain from perf Herer Jack Nirvana Cannabis Seeds, 545 To A Grow Plant How Plant (1972)
"AFOAF grew some (Apollo) recently and got an indica phenotype that finished around 50 days, and a Durban phenotype that took 60 days. The indica phenotype is very resinous, clear high. Not racy nor paranoid. Dense buds, low odor. The Durban phenotype has a stronger high than pure Durban, very clear, very racy, even paranoid. Buds very fluffy, and they flop over from their own weight. Definitely a creeper phenotype in the gene pool (Durban). The mom of A-11 is Genius, an F2 of Jack Herer crossed to an unknown male (likely a Durban imho). The dad of A-11 is Cinderella. Genius expresses the NL and Skunk side of the gene pool. Cindy expresses the Durban and haze side. imho, for the A-11 to have 2 phenotypes in the F1, one of which is fluffy, sweet, and floppy like Durban, means that the Durban gene is in both Apollo and Cindy." - Zorro ns supreme. The "proofs" which have been submitted on this issue are perfect illustrations of our earlier axiom concerning the need to shore up propaganda with pseudoscientific accoutrements. Probably no area of endeavor better illustrates our principle concerning the "politics of reality" than this, the connection between marijuana and crime. The causal connection between marijuana and crime exists only in the minds of men. Paper, as Stalin so cynically observed—and, indeed, put into practice—can be made to print anything. The studies most often cited to prove that marijuana causes crime are those by Munch ("Marihuana and Crime"), Wolff (Marihuana in Latin America), Gardikas ("Hashish and Crime"), an unpublished manuscript by Victor Vogel, and several works by the Indian Chopras. We will examine these reports. Half of Munch's eight-page article on marijuana and crime20] is taken up with enumeration of crimes committed, supposedly, under the influence of marijuana. ( Or so the caption indicates. There is no indication of how the police detected marijuana intoxication. During the entire period when all of the enumerated crimes were committed, there was no known method for detecting the presence of marijuana in the human body. In some of the cases, clues were mentioned, but most of them omit references to the drug.) Sixty-nine cases are included, going back to the 1930S (in one case, back to 1921, before the existence of marijuana laws). A typical case might be "Smoked marijuana for years; held up three taxi-cabs," or "Negro, shot and killed while attempting to holdup grocer in Harlem; plea guilty." Only a glance back at the discussion of the enumerative method of reasoning illuminates the worth of this procedure. Another section of Munch's article is an enumeration of "references" which lists works, most of which assert the connection between marijuana and crime without empirical documentation. A table presents, supposedly, effects of marijuana on the human mind and body. Several of these effects have been empirically demonstrated to be false: hypoglycemia (decrease in blood sugar), a decrease in the rate of respiration, and mydriasis (marked dilation of the pupils), for instance. Other effects are merely asserted and are, by all known accounts, highly improbable: "chronic exposure produces brain lesions," "death by cardiac failure some individuals after l00 to 200 times therapeutic dose,"21] "hypersensitivity sensation of ants running over skin" (not one of my 200 respondents described this particular sensation), "diarrhea or constipation," etc. One wonders, after this inventory of effects, why anyone would ever try the drug; if one believed that these effects ever took place, the fact that millions of people in this country (17 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9 have tried it would be puzzling. Another study commonly cited by police in an effort to demonstrate the criminal tenden Cannabis headquarters - cannabishq.com - home one other point i glass water bongs glass water bongs should address is the quality and quantity of the cannabis used in the recipe most of the recipes i have seen glass water bongs call for a lot sometimes more than. Cannabis paraphernalia canna cafe got a cannabis recipe or munchie treat,then post it here moderators glass water bongs robogro, hazey, big_bud_wulf, tom 35 topics 50 posts last post by potty.glass water bongs Live search cannabis recipes cannabis recipes a recipe for cannabis stir-fry a recipe for bhang, a cannabis drink Cannabis Floraison and hot buttered bhang try apple pot a recipe for cannabis brownies. Cannabis forums message boards - medical marijuana, cannabis club marijuana and cannabis seeds, smoking resources, pot recipes, weed gifts, water bongs, glass pipes, the best prices, 420 sounds, audio clips, marijuana terms and definitions. Todd and Adams in particular carried out extensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies in !:I3-TRCs healer with all his shitana sorcery] powers. There is his supay-masho diabolic bat], whose penetrating waves produce in the victim a sleepy and forgetful weakness so that he can barely defend himself. The healer must raise luminous waves with very powerful colours that dazzle the enemy's eyes, and he calls on his powers of the earth, jungle, water, and sky as a defence. These are from right to left the powers used by the healer: the mantona mama a large snake] of hypnotic magnetism; the supay-yangunturo gigantic diabolic armadillo], able to burrow into the earth at great speed in order to re-emerge where the enemy is; the sinchi-ahui powerful eyes] tiger, with a strong magnetism in its eyes to immobilise his rival; the chicua, a bird that can determine the intentions of the enemy; the allpa-raya land ray] that stings and is also able to fly in pursuit of the enemy; the ishkay-huahuasupay ishkay = two, huahua = child], with a tiger's body and a creature's head, that confuses the enemy by making him hear weeping from one place then another place until the enemy is surprised; the mocagua pot] that is actually a ship in which the healer flies around at great speeds; the black tibes, able to dive, experts in water battles because they attack the eyes of the sorcerer; the guacamayo-machaco, a snake with the breasts of a woman and human arms, who throws poisoned daggers; and the sapo-machaco snake toad] who bites like a snake, very quickly, and has a deadly poison. At top right is the queen Nefina, who has the power to fly with her hair of fire. She has a magnetising mirror with luminous waves that upon hitting the enemy negate his magic powers. She is accompanied by aggressive flying snakes and horses neighing battle. Here also are her ladies Lebina and Magg, armed with powerful fans and long hair that emanates mystical powers, which they use like nets to catch enemies. The healer blows with the power given to him by the ayahuasca. From his powerful tingunas come darts against the supay-masho. The sorcerer is accompa nied by the huaira-umas huaira = air, uma = head, the word meaning "forgetful mind"], snakes that cast a spell that drives the victim crazy, making him forget how to defend himself There are also the ayanahais eyes of the dead], fireflies that move in flocks and which the sorcerer uses as cigarettes. Further up are the huasi-ukullucos wasi = house, ukulluku = lizard], who hide in the bathroom and very quickly get into a person's anus when he defecates, bringing about his death. In the middle we see the puka-cunga-shitanero sorcerer bird with a red neck] who can sting sharply the top of the healer's head to extract the powers he posesses. By its side are the aya-pelejos sloth of the dead] who turn into immense giants who wound with their sharp claws and bite like snakes. Then there are the huairahuacas bulls of the wind] who roar like thunder, confusing their victims, and the chusco-rik
drink liquor,
beer, and wine, on those very occasions in which the drinker also drinks them; drinking
alcohol and smoking pot are not disjunctive and mutually exclusive activities. The very
people who use one often use the other as well on those occasions when it may seem more
appropriate. In fact, marijuana smokers are more likely to drink alcoholic beverages than
nonsmokers are.* It is entirely possible that the legalization and widespread availability of
marijuana will not necessarily result in a greater number of total events in which people
wish to become intoxicated simply because users will continue to use pot selectively as
they presently do. They become high when they feel that the occasion calls for it and use
the same (potentially intoxicating) substances that the rest of society does, in moderation,
when they feel that the occasion calls for that as well. However, it is an empirical question
which can not be answered beforehand as to whether those specific occasions where
alcohol is now consumed without intoxication will eventually call for marijuana use. I
suspect that potsmokers will continue to follow the same sorts of patterns in liquor
consumption that their nonsmoking peers do, drinking their beer, wine, and sherry as a
pleasant companion to other pleasant activities. The appropriateness of one's agent of
choice is defined by the social group that uses it, and many occasions do not call for
getting high.
But what of the other side? What social costs do we have to consider when examining
the damages the present policy is causing? To begin with an issue most Americans assume
that they are hard-headed and pragmatic about—money and resources—we would have to
admit that the present policies are extremely costly.
The deployment of huge numbers of
law enforcement officers in the effort to stop pot use and sales necessarily takes resources
away from heroin and amphetamine traffic. In this sense, the present laws encourage the
use of truly dangerous drugs. And the court costs of processing a single marijuana case
can be, and often are, staggering, and the number of cases handled every year in this
country are beginning to run over l00,000.
How many millions of dollars do we feel is
worth spending? In addition, the laws contribute to a great deal of resentment on both
(24 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
sides. The police realize that they are enforcing a law without ideological support from
large segments of the public. The murderer never questions the right of the police to arrest
him; the marijuana user questions the legitimacy of the law, and thus, the police and the
entire legal process. By multiplying the areas in which the police are expected to enforce
the law, a variety of paranoia develops among the police—in Jerome Skolnick's terms,46]
they begin to see "symbolic assailants" in the populace. In the sense that they would be
able to concentrate on truly dangerous drink liquor,
beer, and wine, on those very occasions in which the drinker also drinks them; drinking
alcohol and smoking pot are not disjunctive and mutually exclusive activities. The very
people who use one often use the other as well on those occasions when it may seem more
appropriate. In fact, marijuana smokers are more likely to drink alcoholic beverages than
nonsmokers are.* It is entirely possible that the legalization and widespread availability of
marijuana will not necessarily result in a greater number of total events in which people
wish to become intoxicated simply because users will continue to use pot selectively as
they presently do. They become high when they feel that the occasion calls for it and use
the same (potentially intoxicating) substances that the rest of society does, in moderation,
when they feel that the occasion calls for that as well. However, it is an empirical question
which can not be answered beforehand as to whether those specific occasions where
alcohol is now consumed without intoxication will eventually call for marijuana use. I
suspect that potsmokers will continue to follow the same sorts of patterns in liquor
consumption that their nonsmoking peers do, drinking their beer, wine, and sherry as a
pleasant companion to other pleasant activities.
The appropriateness of one's agent of
choice is defined by the social group that uses it, and many occasions do not call for
getting high.
But what of the other side? What social costs do we have to consider when examining
the damages the present policy is causing? To begin with an issue most Americans assume
that they are hard-headed and pragmatic about—money and resources—we would have to
admit that the present policies are extremely costly. The deployment of huge numbers of
law enforcement officers in the effort to stop pot use and sales necessarily takes resources
away from heroin and amphetamine traffic. In this sense, the present laws encourage the
use of truly dangerous drugs. And the court costs of processing a single marijuana case
can be, and often are, staggering, and the number of cases handled every year in this
country are beginning to run over l00,000. How many millions of dollars do we feel is
worth spending? In addition, the laws contribute to a great deal of resentment on both
(24 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
sides.
The police realize that they are enforcing a law without ideological support from
large segments of the public. The murderer never questions the right of the police to arrest
him; the marijuana user questions the legitimacy of the law, and thus, the police and the
entire legal process. By multiplying the areas in which the police are expected to enforce
the law, a variety of paranoia develops among the police—in Jerome Skolnick's terms,46]
they begin to see "symbolic assailants" in the populace. In the sense that they would be
able to concentrate on truly dangerous drink liquor,
beer, and wine, on those very occasions in which the drinker also drinks them; drinking
alcohol and smoking pot are not disjunctive and mutually exclusive activities. The very
people who use one often use the other as well on those occasions when it may seem more
appropriate. In fact, marijuana smokers are more likely to drink alcoholic beverages than
nonsmokers are.* It is entirely possible that the legalization and widespread availability of
marijuana will not necessarily result in a greater number of total events in which people
wish to become intoxicated simply because users will continue to use pot selectively as
they presently do. They become high when they feel that the occasion calls for it and use
the same (potentially intoxicating) substances that the rest of society does, in moderation,
when they feel that the occasion calls for that as well. However, it is an empirical question
which can not be answered beforehand as to whether those specific occasions where
alcohol is now consumed without intoxication will eventually call for marijuana use. I
suspect that potsmokers will continue to follow the same sorts of patterns in liquor
consumption that their nonsmoking peers do, drinking their beer, wine, and sherry as a
pleasant companion to other pleasant activities. The appropriateness of one's agent of
choice is defined by the social group that uses it, and many occasions do not call for
getting high.
But what of the other side? What social costs do we have to consider when examining
the damages the present policy is causing? To begin with an issue most Americans assume
that they are hard-headed and pragmatic about—money and resources—we would have to
admit that the present policies are extremely costly. The deployment of huge numbers of
law enforcement officers in the effort to stop pot use and sales necessarily takes resources
away from heroin and amphetamine traffic. In this sense, the present laws encourage the
use of truly dangerous drugs.
And the court costs of processing a single marijuana case
can be, and often are, staggering, and the number of cases handled every year in this
country are beginning to run over l00,000. How many millions of dollars do we feel is
worth spending? In addition, the laws contribute to a great Cannabis Seeds Shop deal of resentment on both
(24 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
sides. The police realize that they are enforcing a law without ideological support from
large segments of the public. The murderer never Pipes
weed bongs Pipes
weed bongs Bongs questions the right of the police to arrest
him; the marijuana user questions the legitimacy of the law, and thus, the police and the
entire legal process. By multiplying the areas in which the police are expected to enforce
the law, a variety of paranoia develops among the police—in Jerome Skolnick's terms,[46
they begin to see "symbolic assailants" in the populace. In the sense that they would be
able to concentrate on truly dangerous drink liquor,
beer, and wine, on those very occasions in which the drinker also drinks them; drinking
alcohol and smoking pot are not disjunctive and mutually exclusive activities. The very
people who use one often use the other as well on those occasions when it may seem more
appropriate. In fact, marijuana smokers are more likely to drink alcoholic beverages than
nonsmokers are.* It is entirely possible that the legalization and widespread availability of
marijuana will not necessarily result in a greater number of total events in which people
wish to become intoxicated simply because users will continue to use pot selectively as
they presently do. They become high when they feel that the occasion calls for it and use
the same (potentially intoxicating) substances that the rest of society does, in moderation,
when they feel that the occasion calls for that as well. However, it is an empirical question
which can not be answered beforehand as to whether those specific occasions where
alcohol is now consumed without intoxication will eventually call for marijuana use. I
suspect that potsmokers will continue to follow the same sorts of patterns in liquor
consumption that their nonsmoking peers do, drinking their beer, wine, and sherry as a
pleasant companion to other pleasant activities. The appropriateness of one's agent of
choice is defined by the social group that uses it, and many occasions do not call for
getting high.
But what of the other side? What social costs do we have to consider when examining
the damages the present policy is causing? To begin with an issue most Americans assume
that they are hard-headed and pragmatic about—money and resources—we would have to
admit that the present policies are extremely costly. The deployment of huge numbers of
law enforcement officers in the effort to stop pot use and sales necessarily takes resources
away from heroin and amphetamine traffic. In this sense, the present laws encourage the
use of truly dangerous drugs. And the court costs of processing a single marijuana case
can be, and often are, staggering, and the number of cases handled every year in this
country are beginning to run over l00,000. How many millions of dollars do we feel is
worth spending? In addition, the laws contribute to a great deal of resentment on both
(24 of 31)4/15/2004 1:08:37 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 11
sides. The police realize that they are enforcing a law without ideological support from
large segments of the public. The murderer never questions the right of the police to arrest
him; the marijuana user questions the legitimacy of the law, and thus, the police and the
entire legal process. By multiplying the areas in which the police are expected to enforce
the law, a variety of paranoia develops among the police—in Jerome Skolnick's terms,46
they begin to see "symbolic assailants" in the populace. In the sense that they would be
able to concentrate on truly dangerous
“These buds are army-green colored, crystally, and evenly covered with long dark orange (almost brown) hairs.
Broken up, these buds release the scent of sweet freshly Kali
Hand
Hand
Hand Glass Kali cut grass or even hay with some slightly skunky
undertones. The smoke is smooth, non-expansive and has a mild sweet taste.
Although the high does not hit
you right away, it first creeps through your body Graines making you feel stoned and then only moderately effects your
cerebrum, allowing you to concentrate on any task at hand. **” – Homepage Amsterdam
I've grown 4 crops of Flo. It Graine Cannabis is very difficult to clone and not very hardy. I lose 40% of the clones, and just lost 2 plants when my hydro system was shut off accidentally. All the other strains survived without any harm, but the Flo dried out beyond recovery. This Orange Bud is not an easy strain to work with. The only reason I keep growing it is because of its fragrance and taste. I love the hashy fragrance and taste. It is truly an exceptional strain in this regard. The seedlings I grew were not very uniform in this regard, which might explain why yours does not have much odor. Revegging this strain takes a very long time.- potattic
Razdan and J Padwa and Goxious, boisterous, boring, fatuous, inane, and often violent. A twenty-two-year-old college graduate, a "dealer," explains: "I go out in the drinking world, sorta.... A lotta my friends in school aren't hip to drugs, and they don't think I am. It's really strange. When I'm stoned, I find it real hard, 'cuz, I don't know, their ways, you know, the jokes and slapping around and loud tones, really gets to you after a while. But when I'm straight I can sorta take it. But not high." It might be hypothesized that this sense of superiority grows out of real or imagined criticism for partaking in a condemned activity. Regardless of the origin of the feeling, it is genuine, and it forms an element in the marijuana subculture. One of the more damaging antimarijuana arguments that users wish to demolish revolves around the notion of the drug being capable of producing psychological dependency. This item in the opposition's propaganda baggage is emphatically rejected; users assert it simply does not happen. "I can take it or leave it," is an almost universal response. Heroin addicts contrast sharply: they often can pinpoint the exact day they realized they were hooked, and, at the more extended stages of use at least, almost never deny their dependency, except insofar as it may be tactically advantageous. Anyone who asserts that marijuana is as dependency-producing as heroin ("At this point the marijuana] user is just as 'hooked' as are the persons we used to call addicts")6] must explain the vast difference between the claims of the two groups; true or false, we assume that they tap some kind of underlying reality. The following affidavit submitted by a former user in defense of a friend who was arrested for marijuana possession illustrates the claim to the complete lack of power of dependency in the chemical agent, cannabis; tobacco, the argument runs, in contrast, has this power: Marijuana is not harmful to my knowledge, because I have been using it since 1949, almost daily, with only beneficial results. It has a relaxing effect when tenseness is present. My depth of perceptions has been increased; this carries over into times when I am not under the influence of marijuana. Teaching children is my profession. I have been a teacher for thirty years and at present am the teacher-principal of a public school. During school I never feel the need of using cannabis sativa, however, each recess is eagerly awaited for smoking cigarettes. I do not consider marijuana a habit-forming drug, but to me nicotine is.7] (3 of 22)4/15/2004 1:03:59 AM The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 4 After the furor which followed this public testament (given to a judge), its author wrote: "... my house is 'clean.' I have had no marijuana in the house since then], nor have I smoked it. This way I am able to prove that marijuana is not addictive or habit-forming, any more than brushing one's teeth or listening to music is addictive."8] In an unp Terlouw, and W These studies'" have also suggested that the entropy of ring formation is the major factor in determining the product of an intramolecular epoxide cleavage , 97,187 (1978) Cushman and N Good luck finding pure haze, I sure didn't get it. My success was planting 6 seeds from Positronics through Jock, kept them in the fridge until germ, and got a 50% germination rate. Of the 3, one turned to be a beautiful male, with a sativa/indica profile, but nice internode lengths, medium green medium wide leaves, heavily serrated. Collected the pollen.... The other two turned out hermie like, one very hermie which unloaded its pollen on some others, the other which a few days before harvest started showing weird misshapen male parts in the midst of the female flowers. The calyxes were very purple as well as the underneath of the small, wide, dark green bud leaves - very indica looking. No pollen released on this one. Am I disappointed? You bet. Had visions of pollinating a real, pure, sativa haze with some of my babes. From everything I've read, haze has been bastardized by the Dutch, it's no longer pure. You don't know what you're getting until you've "groaned" it out.