“BC Big Bud is a stabilized 65% indica/35% sativa, the Dutch Big Bud (Sensi) is all indica. BC Big Bud has
tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture #18 (Steve Kubby header), and a
citrusy scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the crosses, its usually the female in those Romulan x BC
Big Bud Nirvana Cannabis Seeds or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40 US for 10 seeds.
Giant seeds,
largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has no relevance despite what mythology
persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the high is
superior in the BC Big Bud version. The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.” – Marc Emery“BC Big Bud is a stabilized 65% indica/35% sativa, the Dutch Big Bud (Sensi) is all indica. BC Big Bud has
tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture 18 (Steve Kubby header), and a
citrusy scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the Cannabis Floraison crosses, its usually the female in those Romulan x BC
Big Bud or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40 US for 10 seeds.
Giant seeds,
largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has
vah no relevance despite what mythology
persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the high is
superior in the BC Big Bud version. The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.
” – Marc Emery
ur
puka-bufeos pink dolphins], blowing their sorcery upwards.
In the background is the noble fairy Amet on a carriage pulled by winged horses
A vermilion horse with white wings and a two-headed horse called ishcayuma two
heads] escort her. She is about to arrive in an enchanted city called Thodz, the
dwelling place of great gurus and sumis.
To the left we see the giant Liborim with a magical flying dagger he uses against
his enemies. Behind him there are three flying saucers coming from Andromeda to
influence those learning magical sciences with their enigmatic vibrations.
In front of the flying saucer is the house where several curanderos are in the midst
of these beautiful ayahuasca visions.
VISION 3
AYAHUASCA AND CHACRUNA
This painting represents the two plants necessary in preparing the ayahuasca brew.
Out of the ayahuasca vine comes a black snake with yellow, orange, and blue
spots, surrounded by a yellow aura. There is also another snake, the chacruna
snake, of bright and luminous colors. From its mouth comes a violet radiation
surrounded by blue rays. The chacruna snake penetrates the ayahuasca snake,
producing the visionary effect of these two magic plants.
To the left we see the teacher and his disciples covered by the radiation of the
ayahuasca and chacruna plants. The effect on the nervous system is felt in the tip
of the toes and fingers, in the ears, lips, eyes, and nose. This is why those parts are
red.
The combined effect of these plants is esoteric: due to their supernatural
properties, psychic bodies are created that the eyes have never perceived before, so
that one is overwhelmed by this strange new dimension. This world penetrates the
top of the head so that the aura stimulates a gland between the eyebrows.
At the top left we see a bird called rompe-mortajas [an owl] that has been
transformed from a tobacco leaf Below we see a great queen with a golden sceptre.
Her name is Mariquita Toe'. She is a doctor with great knowledge. Below her is the
legendary fairy Quetfael, who knows about medicine and paranormal beauty.
Behind the chacruna serpent we see the great sylph Resfenel, the guardian of
several constellations. We see him here surrounded by meteors and bright sapphires
which illuminate his clothes. To the right we see the great gardener with a golden
stick and a pipe shaped like a snake. This being has the rank ofsatrapa pito'nico,~
and always cares for the ayahuasca plant. The cricket we see near him cries in
alarm when anybody cuts a piece of this plant without first making an offering. If
the offering is made, it listens to the prayers: when ayahuasca is ingested it gives
positive effects.
The skulls here show that those who do not withstand the effect of
ayahuasca may die. One has to prepare one's body properly before taking this plant.
VISION 4
THE SPIRITS OF MOTHERS OF THE PLANTS
In this vision we see Shipibo vegetalista in a trance. One of the shamans is being
overwhelmed byur
puka-bufeos pink dolphins], blowing their sorcery upwards.
In the background is the noble fairy Amet on a carriage pulled by winged horses
A vermilion horse with white wings and a two-headed horse called ishcayuma two
heads] escort her. She is about to arrive in an enchanted city called Thodz, the
dwelling place of great gurus and sumis.
To the left we see the giant Liborim with a magical flying dagger he uses against
his enemies. Behind him there are three flying saucers coming from Andromeda to
influence those learning magical sciences with their enigmatic vibrations.
In front of the flying saucer is the house where several curanderos are in the midst
of these beautiful ayahuasca visions.
VISION 3
AYAHUASCA AND CHACRUNA
This painting represents the two plants necessary in preparing the ayahuasca brew.
Out of the ayahuasca vine comes a black snake with yellow, orange, and blue
spots, surrounded by a yellow aura. There is also another snake, the chacruna
snake, of bright and luminous colors. From its mouth comes a violet radiation
surrounded by blue rays. The chacruna snake penetrates the ayahuasca snake,
producing the visionary effect of these two magic plants.
To the left we see the teacher and his disciples covered by the radiation of the
ayahuasca and chacruna plants. The effect on the nervous system is felt in the tip
of the toes and fingers, in the ears, lips, eyes, and nose. This is why those parts are
red. The combined effect of these plants is esoteric: due to their supernatural
properties, psychic bodies are created that the eyes have never perceived before, so
that one is overwhelmed by this strange new dimension. This world penetrates the
top of the head so that the aura stimulates a gland between the eyebrows.
At the top left we see a bird called rompe-mortajas an owl] that has been
transformed from a tobacco leaf Below we see a great queen with a golden sceptre.
Her name is Mariquita Toe'. She is a doctor with great knowledge. Below her is the
legendary fairy Quetfael, who knows about medicine and paranormal beauty.
Behind the chacruna serpent we see the great sylph Resfenel, the guardian of
several constellations. We see him here surrounded by meteors and bright sapphires
which illuminate his clothes. To the right we see the great gardener with a golden
stick and a pipe shaped like a snake. This being has the rank ofsatrapa pito'nico,~
and always cares for the ayahuasca plant. The cricket we see near him cries in
alarm when anybody cuts a piece of this plant without first making an offering. If
the offering is made, it listens to the prayers: when ayahuasca is ingested it gives
positive effects. The skulls here show that those who do not withstand the effect of
ayahuasca may die. One has to prepare one's body properly before taking this plant.
VISION 4
THE SPIRITS OF MOTHERS OF THE PLANTS
In this vision we see Shipibo vegetalista in a trance. One of the shamans is being
overwhelmed byur
puka-bufeos [pink dolphins, blowing Beaverbong Photos their sorcery upwards.
In the background is the noble fairy Amet on a carriage pulled by winged horses
A vermilion horse with white wings and a two-headed horse called ishcayuma two
heads escort her. She is about to arrive in an enchanted city called Thodz, the
dwelling place of great gurus and sumis.
To the left we see the giant Liborim with a magical flying dagger he uses against
his enemies.
Behind him there are three flying saucers coming from Andromeda to
influence those learning magical sciences with their enigmatic vibrations.
In front of the flying saucer is the house where several curanderos are in the midst
of these beautiful ayahuasca visions.
VISION 3
AYAHUASCA AND CHACRUNA
This painting represents the two plants necessary in preparing the ayahuasca brew.
Out of the ayahuasca vine comes a black snake with yellow, orange, and blue
spots, surrounded by a yellow aura. There is also another snake, the chacruna
snake, of bright and luminous colors. From its mouth comes a violet radiation
surrounded by blue rays. The chacruna snake penetrates the ayahuasca snake,
producing the visionary effect of these two magic plants.
To the left we see the teacher and his disciples covered by the radiation of the
ayahuasca and chacruna plants. The effect on the nervous system is felt in the tip
of the toes and fingers, in the ears, lips, eyes, and nose. This is why those parts are
red. The combined effect of these plants is esoteric: due to their supernatural
properties, psychic bodies are created that the eyes have never perceived before, so
that one is overwhelmed by this strange new dimension. This world penetrates the
top of the head so that the aura stimulates a gland between the eyebrows.
At the top left we see a bird called rompe-mortajas an owl that has been
transformed from a tobacco leaf Below we see a great queen with a golden sceptre.
Her name is Mariquita Toe'. She is a doctor with great knowledge. Below her is the
legendary fairy Quetfael, who knows about medicine and paranormal beauty.
Behind the chacruna serpent we see the great sylph Resfenel, the guardian of
several constellations. We see him here surrounded by meteors and bright sapphires
which illuminate his clothes. To the right we see the great gardener with a golden
stick and a pipe shaped like a snake. This being has the rank ofsatrapa pito'nico,~
and always cares for the ayahuasca plant. The cricket we see near him cries in
alarm when anybody cuts a piece of this plant without first making an offering.
If
the offering is made, it listens to the prayers: when ayahuasca is ingested it gives
positive effects. The skulls here show that those who do not withstand the effect of
ayahuasca may die. One has to prepare one's body properly before taking this plant.
VISION 4
THE SPIRITS OF MOTHERS OF THE PLANTS
In this vision we see Shipibo vegetalista in a trance. One of the shamans is being
overwhelmed byur
puka-bufeos pink dolphins, blowing their sorcery upwards.
In the background is the noble fairy Amet on a carriage pulled by winged horses
A vermilion horse with white wings and a two-headed horse called ishcayuma two
heads escort her. She is about to arrive in an enchanted city called Thodz, the
dwelling place of great gurus and sumis.
To the left we see the giant Liborim with a magical flying dagger he uses against
his enemies. Behind him there are three flying saucers coming from Andromeda to
influence those learning magical sciences with their enigmatic vibrations.
In front of the flying saucer is the house where several curanderos are in the midst
of these beautiful ayahuasca visions.
VISION 3
AYAHUASCA AND CHACRUNA
This painting represents the two plants necessary in preparing the ayahuasca brew.
Out of the ayahuasca vine comes a black snake with yellow, orange, and blue
spots, surrounded by a yellow aura. There is also another snake, the chacruna
snake, of bright and luminous colors. From its mouth comes a violet radiation
surrounded by blue rays. The chacruna snake penetrates the ayahuasca snake,
producing the visionary effect of these two magic plants.
To the left we see the teacher and his disciples covered by the radiation of the
ayahuasca and chacruna plants. The effect on the nervous system is felt in the tip
of the toes and fingers, in the ears, lips, eyes, and nose. This is why those parts are
red. The combined effect of these plants is esoteric: due to their supernatural
properties, psychic bodies are created that the eyes have never perceived before, so
that one is overwhelmed by this strange new dimension.
This world penetrates the
top of the head so that the aura stimulates a gland between the eyebrows.
At the top left we see a bird called rompe-mortajas an owl that has been
transformed from a tobacco leaf Below we see a great queen with a golden sceptre.
Her name is Mariquita Toe'. She is a doctor with great knowledge. Below her is the
legendary fairy Quetfael, who knows about medicine and paranormal beauty.
Behind the chacruna serpent we see the great sylph Resfenel, the guardian of
several constellations. We see him here surrounded by meteors and bright sapphires
which illuminate his clothes. To the right we see the great gardener with a golden
stick and a pipe shaped like a snake. This being has the rank ofsatrapa pito'nico,~
and always cares for the ayahuasca plant. The cricket we see near him cries in
alarm when anybody cuts a piece of this plant without first making an offering. If
the offering is made, it listens to the prayers: when ayahuasca is ingested it gives
positive effects. The skulls here show that those who do not withstand the effect of
ayahuasca may die. One has to prepare one's body properly before taking this plant.
VISION 4
THE SPIRITS OF MOTHERS OF THE PLANTS
In this vision we see Shipibo vegetalista in a trance. One of the shamans is being
overwhelmed by
This variety serves as a standard against which others can be measured.
Winner Marijuana Seed of several harvest festivals, and "High Times" Cannabis Cup. Skunk 1 (75% Sativa, 25% Indica) was originally a cross between 25% Afghani, 25% Mexican Acapulco Gold and 50% Colombian Gold. Inbred since 1978, now a stabilized homogeneous strain. Blooms with long, thick buds, varying in color from light green to golden. Very high flower to leaf ratio. Soft and sweet aroma and a very strong "up" high. Excellent variety for indoor growing or greenhouse with darkening system. Very high yields. Easy to manicure. This variety serves as a standard against which others can be measured. This sounds close to my strain, except the very best go to between 16 and 18 weeks, Homegrown Fantasy must have done what they call improving the strain to reduce the hrs to 10 to 13 because that’s not what Positronics started with. In fact it is very close to what you get with an F1 cross between original haze and original skunk No 1 which is probably closer to the truth. The other thing is to grow original haze well indoors light levels in excess of 100 w per s.f. are needed its not an economical crop.” - Oldtimer1
Buzz- The first time I smoked some Shiskaberry yesterday it really didn’t stone me. Today it has whipped me :) A few hits on the way Beaverbong Photos to school were a few too many, it hit and I became unmotivated. This evening a friend and I finished off two bowls and it was quite the experience. Fair amount of visual distortion, lots of laughs which lead to tears and falling on floor. Totally a "germinate old marijuana seeds" fun indica. I place it a little below the NL x shiva in power level, but still above average. I'd put the Shisk in the social indica category, with the nlxshiva toward the unsociable side.
"germinate old marijuana seeds"
I did have to pull myself from the couch also. These studies'" have also suggested that the entropy of ring formation is the major factor in determining the product of an intramolecular epoxide cleavage that; this is not for production, just personal smoke. The moral may be
that Durban can work in some inside environments, or maybe just the right Durban. Like I say, so far, so
good.
It's 1 foot to the scrog screen and that gives me another foot until the tops are too close to the light. I may
raise the screen a bit next time, as the longest Durban bud is 8 inches.
I let the Durban grow until it nearly
filled up the scrog screen (not exactly a scientific process), and that took about 3-4 weeks from the rooted
clones. Sorry, I NIRVANA CANNABIS SEEDS don't keep a log book or anything like that, so I'm guessing to some extent.
From the time the lights went to 12 hours, the Durban looks to finish about 8 weeks. That's sooner than I
thought, and I'm basing it on the proportion of white to brown hairs, never actually having Durban go all the
way. Outside I had to harvest it early due to mold. I think I'll let it go two more weeks, while I'm away on
vacation, to see if it puts on some weight, which will be about 9 weeks from lights out. The sweet indica being
grown in the same air chamber is already dead ripe.
One thing about Durban; it's very prone to mold. I recommend denuding all the stalks beneath the screen
and using a fan to provide air flow to that area. I lost several stalks to mold before I opened up the dead
space.
Oh, and one last thing.
Remember, I tried Durban sog last year, and it sucked. I had to pull them all out and
start over. It was just this one Durban that seemed to have the potential to stay small that I saved, and it
turns out to be ideally suited to scrog. I can't promise other Durbans will work out." -cha cal
"I grew Dutch Passion's version. It's not worth paying for. From what I hear, the Sensi isn't much better. That
is if you’re looking for a pure sativa with an anise flavour. My plants looked like tall indicas. I'm not saying
that the plants were absolute crap, just that they were not worth the $11 a seed I paid. Paying $28.50 per
blueberry seeds had more value. They were good enough and uniform enough that I've selected the non
hermie plants to create backup seed before I dump the lot.
I think the wild bank in Africa would be the best source. With any luck, I'll have some coming in the mail any
day. I saw some pics of traditional durban leaves at lyceum. Dutch Passion's were not close." -Vic High
“Today I tasted some Durban Poison for the first time. The plant was not mature yet, all pistils still white on
day 60 of 12/12. Durban has a very clear energetic high for me with almost no body. About 90% head, 10%
or less body. The aroma is sweet, like tai. It looks a bit like tai Graines also, but much fluffier and less size to the
calyxes.
It is fun to talk on, go out in public, and energetic. I can see now why many old-timers like it.
Personally it is a nightmare in ScrOG/indoors and I would not recommend the physical characteristics. It
stretches like crazy, and the buds are very fluffy and airy. the colas also fall over bef
I grew it, or at least something called Early Girl, that I got from Holland in the late '80s. It was pretty average all the way around in my opinion. About average yield, high, and everything else. I got some California Orange at the same time and liked it a little better. That was a while back, though. They might have improved Plantar Cannabis it in recent years.” – Been There
Bongs Cheap
BONGS HOMEMADE AND AND align="center"> the real Salernink, J
I created a 'goblet' effect outwards around the top of the wire-tube, and this stopped the damage. Having been eaten back to about 18" in early July, the plants reached about 6' by week-1 Oct. During the whole summer, there was no single week that they were not rained on VERY heavily, and for the last month of their lives they were in perpetual cloud/100% moisture. Only one plant showed any signs of mold (and this one showed only small patches)- which I was extremely pleased with. Harper and A Salernink, J"Regarding Early Girl, Ed Rosenthal says he knows (it was) developed by Cultivators' Choice in California in the 70's.” “Early Girl - This is a mostly Indica early variety developed in Northern California. The plants are compact and very sturdy, and will tend to grow to one main stem. Very potent, medium yield, with a hashy taste and aroma. Inbred for 4 generations and carefully selected for quality and earliness. Early Girl is an outstanding choice for growers seeking an Cheap Bongs early Indica-type.
Terlouw, and W How To Make Bongs crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.[47] The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.48] Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.49] Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful. (Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered. And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.[50] It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result.
They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.47] The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.48] Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.49] Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful.
(Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered.
And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.50] It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result. They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.[47 The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.[48 Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.49 Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful.
(Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered.
And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.
50 It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result.
They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished.
Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.
47 The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.48 Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity.
Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana.
If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.49 Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful.
(Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered. And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.50 It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result.
They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level.
The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable.
Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with , 13, 1101 (1976)
Overgrow Cannabis Seeds Shop align="left"> , 4947 (1969)
How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty Graines Homemade Pipes And Bongs , 4947 (1969) Make To Make To Sensiseedbankhomemade pipes and bongs align="right"> Homemade Pipes And Bongs 222 The Total Synthesis of Cannabinoids A
Culture CannabisHow Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty align="left"> cis ~ Graine home Graine trans Conversion Uliss et al
Buzz- The first time I smoked some Shiskaberry yesterday it really didn’t stone me. Today it has whipped me :) A few hits on the way to school were a few too many, it hit Cheap Bongs and I became unmotivated. This evening a friend and I finished off two bowls and it was quite the experience. Fair amount of visual distortion, lots of laughs which lead to How To Make Bongs tears and falling on floor. Totally a fun indica. I place it a little below the NL x shiva in power level, but vah still above average. I'd put the Shisk in the social indica category, with the nlxshiva toward the unsociable side. I did have to pull myself from the couch also.
Handrick, H Being a big fan of this original cross by Nevil of The Seed Bank, I’ve been waiting for the chance to grow out
Sensi's version of it. The original was the most potent, devasting high I’ve ever had the pleasure of growin.
The best plants leaned to the indica side in her traits, finish was longish but worth it, with tight, large, crystally
buds. Sensi's version today, however, doesn’t come close to the CANNABIS
strainbase CANNABIS original in any way. Its mostly sativa, LOOSE
buds, potency at best average, and Ive honestly lost track how long they've been budding, How Long To Harvest When Buds Get Frosty and 90% of
females not finished yet. I dont really think any of the females(9) I got from this order will be worth keeping,
to say the least Im very disappointed, since I have recommended this strain to so many people. Perhaps the
successful grows of this strain use a mega amount of light since mine is only 40 watts ft/sq. or else it was my
turn to be unlucky with the females in my order, but Id never recommend this to anyone again. I know time
makes the memories better, but I swear the strains from 85-90 from SSSC and The Seed Bank were much
better than most of what we get today, or am I getting old? It seems the hybrid vigor of the crosses from that
era were much more vigorous than crosses today.-stix
50] It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result. They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.47] The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.48] Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.
49] Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful. (Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered.
And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.
50] It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result. They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level.
The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.47 The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.[48 Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.
49 Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful. (Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition.
In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered. And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.[50 It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion.
To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result. They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with crimes, as well as crimes on which there is public support for their prohibition, the police would score a clear gain were marijuana use to be relegalized.47 The damages to an individual traceable to the effects of marijuana are minimal when compared with the damages he sustains at the hands of the legal system.48 Marijuana use and possession probably represents—next to numerous sex crimes without victims, such as cunnilingus—the clearest case where the penalty is incommensurate with the seriousness of the crime. In most cases, the user suffers no damage whatsoever from the use of this weed. In the typical case, it is a harmless activity. Arguments will often be made, particularly by the police, that, of course, in the typical case, marijuana use is relatively innocuous, but that is only because of the relative innocuousness of currently available marijuana. If the user were to get his hands on really potent cannabis—North African hashish, for instance—some serious damage would manifest itself.49 Thus, what is being done is to punish someone for something which is essentially harmless because if he weren't punished, he might do something which is harmful. (Even assuming that there are such great differences in harm to users due to the varying potency different of cannabis preparations.) To my knowledge, this principle is not applied to any other area of law. Moreover, no solid case has been made for the prohibition. In 1937, not a scrap of evidence existed for justifying the passage of the federal law. Today, over a generation later, the fairest statement that could be made is that adequate systematic evidence definitively testing the relative harm of this drug has simply not been gathered. And if a deprivation of liberties is to be imposed, a conclusive case has to be made, as Justice Goldberg declared in Griswold v. Connecticut The burden of proof is clearly on he who would deprive liberties, not he who would exercise them.50 It should be realized that although these "empirical" issues of public safety, rehabilitation, and deterrence are useful for rhetorical purposes, they are not the most powerful motives underlying the administration of the laws. The emotional and "expressive" goals of symbolism and vengeance are far more important, in my opinion. To someone who feels that marijuana use is evil, the laws are just no matter what their practical result. They are an expression of a moral stance, and are beyond criticism on that level. The question of "evil" is intrinsically unanswerable. Merely because crime is widespread is no indication that the laws attempting to prevent it (and failing, in a sense, to do so) are invalid and ought to be abolished. Over 10,000 murders occur in the United States every year; should laws against murder be nullified? There are about a half-million auto thefts Floraison Cannabis yearly in this country, and over a million burglaries. Should laws outlawing these activities be done away with